Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39155540›Full record

ArticleACS chemical neuroscience2024

Defining the Spatial Resolution of Analyte Recovery during Microperfusion-Based Sampling of Brain Parenchyma.

Luke A Stangler, Su-Youne Chang, Inyong Kim, Jonghoon Choi, Abbas Z Kouzani, Kevin E Bennet, Terry C Burns, Jamie J Van Gompel, Gregory A Worrell, Charles L Howe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS chemical neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Luke A StanglerSchool of Engineering, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3216, Australia.
Su-Youne ChangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States.
Inyong KimDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States.
Jonghoon ChoiDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States.
Abbas Z KouzaniSchool of Engineering, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3216, Australia.
Kevin E BennetDivision of Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States.
Terry C BurnsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States.
Jamie J Van GompelDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States.
Gregory A WorrellDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States.
Charles L HoweDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3889-8739

Funding

Glioma intelligence from behind enemy linesR37CA276851 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Terry Burns · 2023 to 2026
$2.1M
Optimizing Pharmacotherapy with Noninvasive Wearable Sensors and Subscalp EEGUH3NS123066 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Benjamin H Brinkmann, Gregory A Worrell · 2025 to 2026
$1.4M
Peri-electrode large molecule microdialysis of the brain during induced seizures in mice, pigs, and humans with epilepsy undergoing resective surgeryR21NS111756 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI HOWE, CHARLES LEE, WORRELL, GREGORY A · 2019 to 2019
$437k
NCI NIH HHS R37 CA276851NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS111756NINDS NIH HHS UH3 NS123066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The unique architecture of the brain and the blood-brain barrier imposes challenges for the measurement of parenchyma-derived biomarkers that prevent sufficient understanding of transient neuropathogenic processes. One solution to this challenge is direct sampling of brain interstitial fluid via implanted microperfusion probes. Seeking to understand spatial limitations to microperfusion in the brain, we employed computational fluid dynamics modeling and empirical recovery of fluorescently labeled dextrans in an animal model. We found that dextrans were successfully recovered via microperfusion over a 6 h sampling period, especially at probes implanted 2 mm from the dextran infusion point relative to probes implanted 5 mm from the injection site. Experimental recovery was consistently around 1% of simulated, suggesting that this parameter can be used to set practical limits on the maximal tissue concentration of proteins measured in microperfusates and on the spatial domain sampled by our multimodal microperfusion probe.

Indexed as

BrainDextransAnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierExtracellular FluidHydrodynamicsMaleParenchymal TissuePerfusionRatsDextransbiomarkerbraincomputational fluid dynamicsdiffusioninterstitial fluidmicroperfusion

Identifiers

PMID39155540
PMCPMC11378288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.