ReviewPlant communications2024
Direct RNA sequencing in plants: Practical applications and future perspectives.
Review in Plant communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dissecting wheat epitranscriptome and proteome under salt stress characterizes an m6A reader gene vital for salinity adaptation.Plant physiology · 2026Article
- The hidden sources of spurious fusion transcripts in plants.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Nanopore direct RNA sequencing and the epitranscriptome: Advances in mapping native RNA landscapes.iMeta · 2026Review
- Beyond Resistance Genes: Silencing Susceptibility.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- Benchmarking methods for genome annotation using nanopore direct RNA in a non-model crop plant.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Bulk RNA-seq datasets analysis integration identifies robust drought-responsive genes and functional networks inFrontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The transcriptome serves as a bridge that links genomic variation to phenotypic diversity. A vast number of studies using next-generation RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) over the last 2 decades have emphasized the essential roles of the plant transcriptome in response to developmental and environmental conditions, providing numerous insights into the dynamic changes, evolutionary traces, and elaborate regulation of the plant transcriptome. With substantial improvement in accuracy and throughput, direct RNA sequencing (DRS) has emerged as a new and powerful sequencing platform for precise detection of native and full-length transcripts, overcoming many limitations such as read length and PCR bias that are inherent to short-read RNA-seq. Here, we review recent advances in dissecting the complexity and diversity of plant transcriptomes using DRS as the main technological approach, covering many aspects of RNA metabolism, including novel isoforms, poly(A) tails, and RNA modification, and we propose a comprehensive workflow for processing of plant DRS data. Many challenges to the application of DRS in plants, such as the need for machine learning tools tailored to plant transcriptomes, remain to be overcome, and together we outline future biological questions that can be addressed by DRS, such as allele-specific RNA modification. This technology provides convenient support on which the connection of distinct RNA features is tightly built, sustainably refining our understanding of the biological functions of the plant transcriptome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.