ArticleUltrasonography (Seoul, Korea)2024
Unsupervised speckle noise reduction technique for clinical ultrasound imaging.
Article in Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A hybrid deep learning framework for real-time speckle reduction and image enhancement on portable ultrasound systems.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Article
- Application and Optimization of Lee Filter for Segmentation of Benign Tumor in Breast Ultrasound Images.Journal of medical physicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDeep learning-based image enhancement has significant potential in the field of ultrasound image processing, as it can accurately model complicated nonlinear artifacts and noise, such as ultrasonic speckle patterns. However, training deep learning networks to acquire reference images that are clean and free of noise presents significant challenges. This study introduces an unsupervised deep learning framework, termed speckle-to-speckle (S2S), designed for speckle and noise suppression. This framework can complete its training without the need for clean (speckle-free) reference images.
methodsThe proposed network leverages statistical reasoning for the mutual training of two in vivo images, each with distinct speckle patterns and noise. It then infers speckle- and noise-free images without needing clean reference images. This approach significantly reduces the time, cost, and effort experts need to invest in annotating reference images manually.
resultsThe experimental results demonstrated that the proposed approach outperformed existing techniques in terms of the signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, structural similarity index, edge preservation index, and processing time (up to 86 times faster). It also performed excellently on images obtained from ultrasound scanners other than the ones used in this work.
conclusionS2S demonstrates the potential of employing an unsupervised learning-based technique in medical imaging applications, where acquiring a ground truth reference is challenging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.