ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025
Simultaneous frequency and phase corrections of single-shot MRS data using cross-correlation.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Altered hypothalamic metabolism in chronic cluster headache patients measured withThe journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe objective of this study was to propose a novel preprocessing approach to simultaneously correct for the frequency and phase drifts in MRS data using cross-correlation technique.
methodsThe performance of the proposed method was first investigated at different SNR levels using simulation. Random frequency and phase offsets were added to a previously acquired STEAM human data at 7 T, simulating two different noise levels with and without baseline artifacts. Alongside the proposed spectral cross-correlation (SC) method, three other simultaneous alignment approaches were evaluated. Validation was performed on human brain data at 3 T and mouse brain data at 16.4 T.
resultsThe results showed that the SC technique effectively corrects for both small and large frequency and phase drifts, even at low SNR levels. Furthermore, the mean square measurement error of the SC algorithm was comparable to the other three methods used, with much faster processing time. The efficacy of the proposed technique was successfully demonstrated in both human brain MRS data and in a noisy MRS dataset acquired from a small volume-of-interest in the mouse brain.
conclusionThe study demonstrated the availability of a fast and robust technique that accurately corrects for both small and large frequency and phase shifts in MRS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.