Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39155370›Full record

SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2024

Prevalence of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria among neonates suspected for sepsis in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Assefa Sisay, Zelalem Asmare, Getinet Kumie, Yalewayker Gashaw, Ermias Getachew, Agenagnew Ashagre, Marye Nigatie, Sisay Ayana, Tadesse Misganaw, Zelalem Dejazmach and 11 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Global epidemiology of carbapenem-resistantJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. High prevalence of blaBMC microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Editorial: Advancing understanding of neonatal bacterial infections.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Assefa SisayDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia. asefasisay23@gmail.com.
Zelalem AsmareDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Getinet KumieDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Yalewayker GashawDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Ermias GetachewDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Agenagnew AshagreDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Marye NigatieDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Sisay AyanaDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Tadesse MisganawDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Zelalem DejazmachDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Wagaw AbebeDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Solomon GedfieDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Selamyhun TadesseDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Muluken GashawDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Abdu JemalDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Woldeteklehymanot KassahunDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Atitegeb Abera KidieDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Biruk Beletew AbateDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Chalie MulugetaDepartment of Midwifery, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Abebaw AlamrewDepartment of Midwifery, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Melese Abate RetaDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe emergence and rapid spread of gram-negative bacteria resistant to carbapenems among newborns is concerning on a global scale. Nonetheless, the pooled estimate of gram-negative bacteria resistant to carbapenem that cause neonatal sepsis in developing nations remains unknown. Thus, this study aimed to determine the combined prevalence of gram-negative bacteria resistant to carbapenem in African newborns who were suspected of having sepsis.

methodsAll studies published from January 1, 2010, up to December 30, 2023, from PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus electronic databases, and the Google Scholar search engine were researched. Isolates tested for carbapenem from neonates with sepsis, English language papers conducted in Africa, and cross-sectional and cohort studies papers were included. Using PRISMA guidelines, we systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed studies that assessed the prevalence of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria. The "Joanna Briggs Institute" was used critically to evaluate the quality of the included studies. The data analysis was carried out using STATA™ version 17. Heterogeneity across the studies was evaluated using Q and I

resultsAll 36 studies were included in the meta-analysis and systematic review. The pooled prevalence of carbapenem resistance in Africa was 30.34% (95% CI 22.03-38.64%). The pooled estimate of gram-negative bacteria resistant to imipenem, and meropenem was 35.57% (95% CI 0.67-70.54%) and 34.35% (95% CI 20.04% - 48.67%), respectively. A. baumannii and Pseudomonas spp. had pooled prevalence of 45.9% (95% CI 33.1-58.7%) and 43.0% (95% CI 23.0-62.4%), respectively. Similarly, Pseudomonas spp. and A. baumannii also exhibited strong meropenem resistance, with a pooled prevalence of 29.2% (95% CI 4.8-53.5%) and 36.7% (95% CI 20.1-53.3%), respectively. E. coli and K. pneumoniae were the two most common isolates.

conclusionThere should be urgent antimicrobial stewardship practices, strengthened surveillance systems and effective treatment for neonates with sepsis. There was remarkable variation in resistance across the continent.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenemsGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsNeonatal SepsisAfricaDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansInfant, NewbornMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPrevalenceAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenemsAfricaCarbapenem-resistantGram-negative bacteriaNeonatesSepsisSystematic review and meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID39155370
PMCPMC11330605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.