ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2024
Bacteroides fragilis in saliva: investigating links with ulcerative colitis.
Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fecal metagenomic profiling in patients with colorectal adenomas to characterize gut microbial composition and functional potential.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUlcerative colitis (UC) is a long-term bowel inflammation of unknown cause. Recent research points to gut microbiota, especially Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis (ETBF), in UC's development. This study examined the presence of Bacteroides fragilis (B. fragilis) and ETBF in the saliva of UC patients and Healthy Controls (HCs) in Iran.
methodsA total of 40 UC patients and 40 healthy controls were included in the study. Saliva samples were collected and analyzed for the presence of B. fragilis and ETBF using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
resultsB. fragilis was more prevalent in HCs (70%) than UC patients (67.5%), but not significantly (p = 0.809). ETBF was significantly more prevalent in UC patients (50%) than HCs (10%) (p < 0.0001). The mean count of B. fragilis was higher in UC patients, but not significantly (p = 0.47). However, the mean count of ETBF was significantly higher in UC patients (p = 0.000089). In terms of gender, the number of B. fragilis in women was not significant (p = 0.16), but the number of ETBF was significantly higher in women with UC (p = 0.000458). For men, no significant differences were observed.
conclusionsThe present study suggest a higher prevalence of B. fragilis observed in UC patients compared to HCs. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and explore potential mechanisms underlying this association.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.