ArticleScientific reports2024
Subject-specific atlas for automatic brain tissue segmentation of neonatal magnetic resonance images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Atlas-based spatiotemporal MRI phenotyping of 3D fungal spread in grapevine wood.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Neonatal brain age estimation from T2-weighted magnetic resonance images using shallow regression analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developing advanced systems for 3D brain tissue segmentation from neonatal magnetic resonance (MR) images is vital for newborn structural analysis. However, automatic segmentation of neonatal brain tissues is challenging due to smaller head size and inverted T1/T2 tissue contrast compared to adults. In this work, a subject-specific atlas based technique is presented for segmentation of gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from neonatal MR images. It involves atlas selection, subject-specific atlas creation using random forest (RF) classifier, and brain tissue segmentation using the expectation maximization-Markov random field (EM-MRF) method. To increase the segmentation accuracy, different tissue intensity- and gradient-based features were used. Evaluation on 40 neonatal MR images (gestational age of 37-44 weeks) demonstrated an overall accuracy of 94.3% and an average Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.945 (GM), 0.947 (WM), and 0.912 (CSF). Compared to multi-atlas segmentation methods like SEGMA and EM-MRF with multiple atlases, our method improved accuracy by up to 4%, particularly in complex tissue regions. Our proposed method allows accurate brain tissue segmentation, a crucial step in brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) applications including brain surface reconstruction and realistic head model creation in neonates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.