Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39155294›Full record

ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2024

Spatial computational modelling illuminates the role of the tumour microenvironment for treating glioblastoma with immunotherapies.

Blanche Mongeon, Julien Hébert-Doutreloux, Anudeep Surendran, Elham Karimi, Benoit Fiset, Daniela F Quail, Logan A Walsh, Adrianne L Jenner, Morgan Craig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Blanche MongeonSainte-Justine University Hospital Azrieli Research Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9324-5012
Julien Hébert-DoutrelouxSainte-Justine University Hospital Azrieli Research Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Anudeep SurendranCenter for Advanced Systems Understanding, Görlitz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0777-4642
Elham KarimiRosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Benoit FisetRosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Daniela F QuailRosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Logan A WalshRosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Adrianne L JennerSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Morgan CraigSainte-Justine University Hospital Azrieli Research Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada. morgan.craig@umontreal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4852-4770

Funding

Gouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Conseil de Recherches en Sciences Naturelles et en Génie du Canada) RGPIN-2018-04546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma is the most common and deadliest brain tumour in adults, with a median survival of 15 months under the current standard of care. Immunotherapies like immune checkpoint inhibitors and oncolytic viruses have been extensively studied to improve this endpoint. However, most thus far have failed. To improve the efficacy of immunotherapies to treat glioblastoma, new single-cell imaging modalities like imaging mass cytometry can be leveraged and integrated with computational models. This enables a better understanding of the tumour microenvironment and its role in treatment success or failure in this hard-to-treat tumour. Here, we implemented an agent-based model that allows for spatial predictions of combination chemotherapy, oncolytic virus, and immune checkpoint inhibitors against glioblastoma. We initialised our model with patient imaging mass cytometry data to predict patient-specific responses and found that oncolytic viruses drive combination treatment responses determined by intratumoral cell density. We found that tumours with higher tumour cell density responded better to treatment. When fixing the number of cancer cells, treatment efficacy was shown to be a function of CD4 + T cell and, to a lesser extent, of macrophage counts. Critically, our simulations show that care must be put into the integration of spatial data and agent-based models to effectively capture intratumoral dynamics. Together, this study emphasizes the use of predictive spatial modelling to better understand cancer immunotherapy treatment dynamics, while highlighting key factors to consider during model design and implementation.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsComputer SimulationGlioblastomaImmunotherapyTumor MicroenvironmentHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsOncolytic VirotherapyOncolytic VirusesImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID39155294
PMCPMC11330976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.