ArticlePhysiological reports2024
Reproducibility of autonomic cardiovascular function and hemodynamics at rest and during recovery from exercise.
Article in Physiological reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Skeletal muscle phenotype and blood pressure after acute exercises.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Reproducibility of autonomic cardiovascular function and hemodynamics at rest and during recovery from exercise.Physiological reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Smartwatches and home-based blood pressure (BP) devices have permitted easy use of heart rate variability (HRV) and BP to identify the recovery status of users after acute exercise training. The reproducibility of HRV and BP after exercise in healthy young participants is not well known. Eighteen participants (age 27 ± 6 years, female n = 8) performed test and retest aerobic exercises (cycling, 30 min, 60% of peak workload, W) and a control session in randomized order. RMSSD, high and low-frequency power of RR intervals, and BP were measured at rest and 30-60 min after interventions. The relative reproducibility was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The absolute reproducibility was evaluated using the coefficient of variation (CV%). HRV indices revealed moderate-to-excellent reproducibility at rest (ICC 0.81-0.86; 95% CI 0.53-0.95) but not after exercise (ICC -0.06 to 0.60; 95% CI -1.85 to 0.85). Systolic BP had a good-to-excellent reproducibility before (ICC 0.93; 95% CI 0.81-0.98, CV% 4.2) and after exercise (ICC 0.93; 95% CI 0.81-0.97, CV% 4.2). The reproducibility of HRV indices is poor after exercise in young participants. However, the reproducibility of BP is excellent at rest and after aerobic exercise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.