ReviewChemistry, an Asian journal2024
3D Printing MXene-Based Electrodes for Supercapacitors.
Review in Chemistry, an Asian journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 3D Printing MXene-Based Electrodes for Supercapacitors.Chemistry, an Asian journal · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
3D printing, as an advanced and promising strategy for processing electrode for energy storage devices, such as supercapacitors and batteries, has garnered considerable interest in recent decades. The interest in 3D printed electrodes stems from its exceptional performance and manufacturing features, including customized sizes and shapes and the layer-by-layer processing principle, etc., especially integrating with MXene which allows the manufacturing of electrodes from different raw materials and possessing desired electrochemical properties. Herculean challenges, such as material compatibility of the printing inks, nondurable interfacial or bulk mechanical strength of the printed electrodes, and sometimes the low capacitance, lead to inferior electrochemical performance and hinder the practical applications of this promising technology. In this review, we firstly summarize the representative 3D printing methods, then, review the MXene-based 3D printing electrodes made from different materials, and last, provide electrochemical performance of 3D printing MXene-based electrodes for supercapacitors. Furthermore, based on a summary on the recent progress, an outlook on these promising electrodes for sustainable energy devices is provided. We anticipate that this review could provide some insights into overcoming the challenges and achieving more remarkable electrochemical performance of 3D printing supercapacitor electrodes and offer perspectives in the future for emerging energy devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.