Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39155107›Full record

ArticleMethods in enzymology2024

Kinetic analysis of the three-substrate reaction mechanism of an NRPS-independent siderophore (NIS) synthetase.

Andrew M Gulick, Lisa S Mydy, Ketan D Patel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in enzymology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrew M GulickDepartment of Structural Biology, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY, United States. Electronic address: amgulick@buffalo.edu.
Lisa S MydyDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Ketan D PatelDepartment of Structural Biology, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY, United States.

Funding

Structural Studies of Nonribosomal Peptide SynthesisR35GM136235 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI GULICK, ANDREW M · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biosynthesis of many bacterial siderophores employs a member of a family of ligases that have been defined as NRPS-independent siderophore (NIS) synthetases. These NIS synthetases use a molecule of ATP to produce an amide linkage between a carboxylate and an amine. Commonly used carboxylate substrates include citrate or α-ketoglutarate, or derivatives thereof, while the amines are often hydroxamate derivatives of lysine or ornithine, or their decarboxylated forms cadaverine and putrescine. Enzymes that employ three substrates to catalyze a reaction may proceed through alternate mechanisms. Some enzymes use sequential mechanisms in which all three substrates bind prior to any chemical steps. In such mechanisms, substrates can bind in a random, ordered, or mixed fashion. Alternately, other enzymes employ a ping-pong mechanism in which a chemical step occurs prior to the binding of all three substrates. Here we describe an enzyme assay that will distinguish among these different mechanisms for the NIS synthetase, using IucA, an enzyme involved in the production of aerobactin, as the model system.

Indexed as

Peptide SynthasesSiderophoresBacterial ProteinsEnzyme AssaysKetoglutaric AcidsKineticsLigasesSubstrate SpecificityBacterial ProteinsKetoglutaric AcidsLigasesnon-ribosomal peptide synthasePeptide SynthasesSiderophoresAerobactinMechanistic enzymologyNIS synthesesNRPS-independent siderophoresSiderophore biosynthesis

Identifiers

PMID39155107
PMCPMC11331036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.