ArticleHeart rhythm2025
Apixaban vs rivaroxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation at high or low bleeding risk: A population-based cohort study.
Article in Heart rhythm, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Reduced-Dose Versus Full-Dose Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the Extended Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Pulmonary thromboembolism in Glanzmann Thrombasthenia: a case report and systematic literature review.Annals of hematology · 2026Pooled it
- Real-World Bleeding Outcomes Among Hospitalized Patients Receiving Apixaban or Rivaroxaban: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparison of aspirin and rivaroxaban for the prevention of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis in high thrombotic risk patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: study protocol for a multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial.Lupus science & medicine · 2026Article
- Outcomes of individual DOACs vs. VKAs in AF patients with frailty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026Article
- Bleeding risk in East Asian patients with atrial fibrillation: Validation of the DOAC score in a Japanese multicenter registry.Heart rhythm O2 · 2025Article
- Hemorrhage risk associated with triple antithrombotic therapy: a focused real-world pharmacovigilance disproportional analysis study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite many atrial fibrillation (AF) patients being at risk of bleeding, very limited data are available on bleeding rates of different direct oral anticoagulants based on the spectrum of bleeding risk.
objectiveWe aimed to compare the risk of major bleeding and thromboembolic events with apixaban vs rivaroxaban for AF patients stratified by bleeding risk.
methodsWe conducted a population-based, retrospective cohort study of all adult patients (66 years or older) with AF in Ontario, Canada, who were treated with apixaban or rivaroxaban between April 1, 2011, and March 31, 2020. Bleeding risk was estimated by the HAS-BLED score, with high bleeding risk defined as a score of ≥3. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding, and the primary efficacy outcome was thromboembolic events. Comparisons were adjusted for baseline comorbidities by inverse probability of treatment weighting.
resultsThis study included 18,156 AF patients with high bleeding risk and 55,186 AF patients with low bleeding risk. Apixaban use was more common in patients with high bleeding risk; 63% of high-risk patients used apixaban compared with 56% of low-risk patients. Apixaban users had lower rates of major bleeding in high-risk patients (2.9% vs 4.2% per year; hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.58-0.81) and in low-risk patients (1.8% vs 2.9% per year; HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.56-0.70) compared with rivaroxaban. There were no differences in rates of thromboembolic events, 3.1% vs 3.0% per year (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.86-1.22) in high-risk patients and 1.9% vs 1.9% per year (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.89-1.14) in low-risk patients.
conclusionIn older AF patients with high or low bleeding risk, treatment with apixaban was associated with lower rates of major bleeding with no difference in risk for thromboembolic events compared with rivaroxaban.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.