ArticlePoultry science2024
Research note: Indirect evidence of avian Metapneumovirus circulation in broilers in Italy.
Article in Poultry science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating heterogeneous data to address endemic diseases in broiler production: insights from a Polish case study.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clinical relevance of avian metapneumovirus (aMPV) is growing in the poultry sector, especially in broiler farming, where no vaccination is administered in Italy. Given the naïve status of the birds, a serological survey was conducted in a densely populated area of Northern Italy, to evaluate aMPV circulation. Seven farms were selected and sampled in summer/fall, then sampling was repeated in the following season (winter/spring) to assess a possible seasonal effect. In each farm, fifteen birds were blood sampled towards the end of the cycle and sera were analyzed with an ELISA test. Clinical signs were reported in 5 out of 7 farms, although all farms were positive at both sampling points, except for one, which was negative at the first sampling. The seroprevalence within farm ranged from 26.6% to 100%, and antibody titres appear to increase with age. No seasonality effect was evidenced, whereas a farm effect was more distinct. aMPV circulation appears wide in Northern Italian farms, with different clinical outcomes that could be modulated by intrinsic characteristics of the farms. In absence of vaccination, serological monitoring can be a useful tool for viral entrance monitoring, although sampling timing should be evaluated in order to spot seroconversion after late infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.