Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39154607›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2024

In-ovo injection of Bacillus subtilis, raffinose, and their combinations enhances hatchability, gut health, nutrient transport- and intestinal function-related genes, and early development of broiler chicks.

Abdelrazeq M Shehata, Nermien Helmy Seddek, Tarek Khamis, Shaaban S Elnesr, Hela Rached Nouri, Hibah M Albasri, Vinod Kumar Paswan

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abdelrazeq M ShehataDepartment of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. Electronic address: abdelrazeq@azhar.edu.eg.
Nermien Helmy SeddekDepartment of Respiratory Care, College of Applied Medical Sciences-Jubail, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Jubail, Saudi Arabia.
Tarek KhamisDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt; Laboratory of Biotechnology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Shaaban S ElnesrDepartment of Poultry Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt.
Hela Rached NouriDepartment of Basic Sciences, Deanship of Preparatory Year and Supporting Studies, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 34212, Saudi Arabia.
Hibah M AlbasriDepartment of Biology, College of Science, Taibah University, Madinah, Saudi Arabia.
Vinod Kumar PaswanDepartment of Dairy Science and Food Technology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to assess the response of chicks to in-ovo injection of Bacillus subtilis (probiotic), raffinose (prebiotic), and their combinations. The study used 1,500 embryonated eggs allotted to 10 groups/ 6 replicates (150 eggs/group). The experimental treatments were: 1) un-injected control (NC); 2) sham (sterile distilled water) (PC); 3) probiotic 4 × 10

Indexed as

Bacillus subtilisChickensPrebioticsProbioticsRaffinoseAnimalsChick EmbryoGastrointestinal TractIntestinesOvumPrebioticsRaffinoseBacillus subtilischick qualityin-ovo injectionraffinose

Identifiers

PMID39154607
PMCPMC11471093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.