Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39154370›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiation research2024

Impact of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy on toxicity in intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Itsuko Serizawa, Takuyo Kozuka, Takashi Soyano, Kazuma Sasamura, Tatsuya Kamima, Hiroaki Kunogi, Noboru Numao, Shinya Yamamoto, Junji Yonese, Yasuo Yoshioka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiation research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Itsuko SerizawaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan.
Takuyo KozukaDepartment of Radiology, University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.
Takashi SoyanoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, 2-5-1 Higashigaoka, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-0021, Japan.
Kazuma SasamuraDepartment of Radiology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, 1-26-1 Kyonancho, Musashino City, Tokyo 180-8610, Japan.
Tatsuya KamimaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan.
Hiroaki KunogiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan.
Noboru NumaoDepartment of Genitourinary Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan.
Shinya YamamotoDepartment of Genitourinary Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan.
Junji YoneseDepartment of Genitourinary Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan.
Yasuo YoshiokaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to compare toxicities, prostate volume and dosimetry, between patients who underwent intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) combined with ≥3 months of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (NADT) and those without NADT for prostate cancer. In total, 449 patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer received 78 Gy IMRT in 39 fractions, of which 129 were treated without any ADT (non-ADT group) and 320 with NADT ≥3 months (NADT group). Adverse events and dose-volume indices were compared between the two groups retrospectively. The NADT group had a lower rate of acute grade 2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities (17% vs 25%, P = 0.063) and late grade 2 GI toxicities (P = 0.055), including a significantly lower rate of late grade 2 rectal hemorrhage (P = 0.033), compared with the non-ADT group. There were no cases of late grade 3 or higher GI toxicities. The average volume of the prostate in the NADT group was 38% smaller than that in the non-ADT group (43.7 vs 27.0 cm3, P < 0.001). Bladder V40Gy and V50Gy, and rectum V40Gy, V50Gy, V60Gy and V70Gy were significantly smaller in the NADT group. In the NADT group, no significant difference was observed in adverse events or dosimetry between the subgroups with NADT ≥12 and <12 months. Acute and late rectal toxicities were reduced by NADT within ≥3 months in accordance with reduced prostate volume and improved rectal dosimetry. This suggests a merit of administering neoadjuvant ADT ≥3 months for reducing rectal toxicities.

Indexed as

Androgen AntagonistsNeoadjuvant TherapyProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedAgedAged, 80 and overDose-Response Relationship, RadiationHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiotherapy DosageRetrospective StudiesAndrogen AntagonistsIMRTNADTprostate carcinomaradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID39154370
PMCPMC11420847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.