Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39154316›Full record

Trial reportJournal of anesthesia2024

Comparing the hemodynamic effects of ketamine versus fentanyl bolus in patients with septic shock: a randomized controlled trial.

Maha Mostafa, Ahmed Hasanin, Basant Reda, Mohamed Elsayad, Marwa Zayed, Mohamed E Abdelfatah

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of anesthesia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05957302 (Comparing the Hemodynamic Effects of Bolus of Ketamine and Fentanyl in Patients With Septic Shock), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05957302 nacompletednot on this map

Comparing the Hemodynamic Effects of Bolus of Ketamine and Fentanyl in Patients With Septic Shock: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled86ConditionsKetamine, Fentanyl, Septic ShockArmsKetamine, Fentanyl
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maha MostafaDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ahmed HasaninDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. ahmedmohamedhasanin@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9947-5863
Basant RedaDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohamed ElsayadDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Marwa ZayedDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohamed E AbdelfatahDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKetamine and fentanyl are commonly used for sedation and induction of anesthesia in critically ill patients. This study aimed to compare the hemodynamic effects of ketamine versus fentanyl bolus in patients with septic shock.

methodsThis randomized controlled trial included mechanically ventilated adults with septic shock receiving sedation. Patients were randomized to receive either 1 mg/kg ketamine bolus or 1 mcg/kg fentanyl bolus. Cardiac output (CO), stroke volume (SV), heart rate (HR), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured at the baseline, 3, 6, 10, and 15 min after the intervention. Delta CO was calculated as the change in CO at each time point in relation to baseline measurement. The primary outcome was delta CO 6 min after administration of the study drug. Other outcomes included CO, SV, HR, and MAP.

resultsEighty-six patients were analyzed. The median (quartiles) delta CO 6 min after drug injection was 71(37, 116)% in the ketamine group versus - 31(- 43, - 12)% in the fentanyl group, P value < 0.001. The CO, SV, HR, and MAP increased in the ketamine group and decreased in the fentanyl group in relation to the baseline reading; and all were higher in the ketamine group than the fentanyl group.

conclusionIn patients with septic shock, ketamine bolus was associated with higher CO and SV compared to fentanyl bolus. CLINICAL

trial registrationDate of registration: 24/07/2023. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT05957302. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05957302 .

Indexed as

FentanylHemodynamicsKetamineShock, SepticAdultAgedAnesthetics, DissociativeAnesthetics, IntravenousCardiac OutputFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedRespiration, ArtificialStroke VolumeAnesthetics, DissociativeAnesthetics, IntravenousFentanylKetamineCardiac outputFentanylHypotensionKetamineMechanical ventilationSedationSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID39154316
PMCPMC11584442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.