Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39154315›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

Speed and efficiency: evaluating pulmonary nodule detection with AI-enhanced 3D gradient echo imaging.

Sebastian Ziegelmayer, Alexander W Marka, Maximilian Strenzke, Tristan Lemke, Hannah Rosenkranz, Bernadette Scherer, Thomas Huber, Kilian Weiss, Marcus R Makowski, Dimitrios C Karampinos and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Deep Learning-accelerated MRI in Body and Chest.Journal of computer assisted tomography
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sebastian Ziegelmayer *Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alexander W Marka *Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. alexander.marka@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2111-8177
Maximilian StrenzkeDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Tristan LemkeDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Hannah RosenkranzDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Bernadette SchererDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Thomas HuberDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Kilian WeissPhilips GmbH Market DACH, Hamburg, Germany.
Marcus R MakowskiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Dimitrios C KarampinosDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Markus GrafDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Joshua GawlitzaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEvaluating the diagnostic feasibility of accelerated pulmonary MR imaging for detection and characterisation of pulmonary nodules with artificial intelligence-aided compressed sensing. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this prospective trial, patients with benign and malignant lung nodules admitted between December 2021 and December 2022 underwent chest CT and pulmonary MRI. Pulmonary MRI used a respiratory-gated 3D gradient echo sequence, accelerated with a combination of parallel imaging, compressed sensing, and deep learning image reconstruction with three different acceleration factors (CS-AI-7, CS-AI-10, and CS-AI-15). Two readers evaluated image quality (5-point Likert scale), nodule detection and characterisation (size and morphology) of all sequences compared to CT in a blinded setting. Reader agreement was determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

resultsThirty-seven patients with 64 pulmonary nodules (solid n = 57 [3-107 mm] part-solid n = 6 [ground glass/solid 8 mm/4-28 mm/16 mm] ground glass nodule n = 1 [20 mm]) were analysed. Nominal scan times were CS-AI-7 3:53 min; CS-AI-10 2:34 min; CS-AI-15 1:50 min. CS-AI-7 showed higher image quality, while quality remained diagnostic even for CS-AI-15. Detection rates of pulmonary nodules were 100%, 98.4%, and 96.8% for CS-AI factors 7, 10, and 15, respectively. Nodule morphology was best at the lowest acceleration and was inferior to CT in only 5% of cases, compared to 10% for CS-AI-10 and 23% for CS-AI-15. The nodule size was comparable for all sequences and deviated on average < 1 mm from the CT size.

conclusionThe combination of compressed sensing and AI enables a substantial reduction in the scan time of lung MRI while maintaining a high detection rate of pulmonary nodules. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Incorporating compressed sensing and AI in pulmonary MRI achieves significant time savings without compromising nodule detection or characteristics. This advancement holds clinical promise, enhancing efficiency in lung cancer screening without sacrificing diagnostic quality. KEY POINTS: Lung cancer screening by MRI may be possible but would benefit from scan time optimisation. Significant scan time reduction, high detection rates, and preserved nodule characteristics were achieved across different acceleration factors. Integrating compressed sensing and AI in pulmonary MRI offers efficient lung cancer screening without compromising diagnostic quality.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceImaging, Three-DimensionalLung NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultiple Pulmonary NodulesSolitary Pulmonary NoduleAdultAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedComputed tomographyLungMagnetic resonance imagesMultiple pulmonary nodules

Identifiers

PMID39154315
PMCPMC11914225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.