Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39154309›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics - open2024

Economic Impact of Bladder Cancer in the USA.

Otavio Clark, Tulio Sarmento, Anthony Eccleston, Julia Brinkmann, Renato Picoli, Vamsi Daliparthi, Jorine Voss, Sanjana Chandrasekar, Allison Thompson, Jane Chang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics - open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Long-term Trends in Bladder Cancer Incidence Using a Harmonized Staging Variable: A SEER-Based Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Otavio ClarkOracle®, Santa Clara, USA. otavio.clark@oracle.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1607-2589
Tulio SarmentoOracle®, São Paulo, Brazil.
Anthony EcclestonPfizer Inc, Surrey, GB, UK.
Julia BrinkmannPfizer Inc, Berlin, Germany.
Renato PicoliOracle®, São Paulo, Brazil.
Vamsi DaliparthiOracle®, Santa Clara, USA.
Jorine VossOracle®, Santa Clara, USA.
Sanjana ChandrasekarPfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA.
Allison ThompsonPfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA.
Jane ChangPfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIncidence and mortality for bladder cancer has changed very little over the past 20 years. Approximately 40% of patients with high-risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer eventually recur/progress. It is important to understand the economic impact of disease recurrence/progression in bladder cancer. Our aim was to estimate and understand the direct costs associated with the treatment of bladder cancer from the payer's perspective in the USA, in the year of 2021, including costs for both newly diagnosed bladder cancer (stages 0a-IV) and recurrent patients.

methodsAn economic model was constructed to calculate the number of patients receiving each treatment modality at every stage of disease and their respective costs. Epidemiological data were based on the CancerMPact Patient Metrics (PM) database and treatment modality data retrieved from CMP Treatment Architecture (TA), 2021 version. Resource utilization and costs were obtained from medical literature and public data sources. Only direct costs were considered.

resultsThere were an estimated 83,532 newly diagnosed patients with bladder cancer of all stages in 2021 with a projected total cost of treatment of ~$2.6 billion. Average cost per newly diagnosed patient varied from $19,521 (stage 0a) to $169,533 (metastatic disease). Cost profile differed substantially among the stages of disease. For the 75,760 patients that were expected to have a recurrence in 2021, an additional cost of ~$3.9 billion was estimated at an average cost per patient of $52,179. The expected total cost to treat newly diagnosed and newly recurrent patients is reported in this model, with the total cost in 2021 estimated to exceed $6.5 billion.

conclusionsTreatment and resource costs increase for bladder cancer as the disease recurs/progresses. More effective treatments that can delay recurrence/progression may reduce the economic burden associated with bladder cancer.

Identifiers

PMID39154309
PMCPMC11499469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.