ArticlePharmacoEconomics - open2024
Economic Impact of Bladder Cancer in the USA.
Article in PharmacoEconomics - open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.Future science OA · 2026Review
- Economic Considerations in the Management of Superficial Bladder Cancer.The Urologic clinics of North America · 2026Review
- Beyond the Rotisserie: Dispelling the Myths of Intravesical Therapy and Pioneering a Precision Future for Bladder Cancer.Urology research & practice · 2026Article
- Evidence for a Tumor-Suppressive Role of SHP-1 in EMT Regulation in Bladder Cancer Cells.Cancers · 2026Article
- Use of Artificial Intelligence Model Associated with Masson's Trichrome Staining as a Predictor of Muscle Invasion in Bladder Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Contemporary Role for Blue Light Cystoscopy Across the Bladder Cancer Disease Spectrum.Current urology reports · 2026Review
- Urine-derived induced pluripotent stem cells for non-invasive diagnosis of bladder cancer.Journal of Cancer · 2026Review
- Real-world economic burden of disease recurrence in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A population-level claims-based analysis.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2025Observational
- Long-term Trends in Bladder Cancer Incidence Using a Harmonized Staging Variable: A SEER-Based Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025Article
- Real-World Retrospective Study of Clinical and Economic Outcomes Among Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with First-Line Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapies in the United States: Results from the IMPACT UC-III Study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- CXCL12 links bladder cancer and diabetes as a potential biomarker.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Carcinogen metabolism and bladder cancer: role of gut microbiota in disease and prevention.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- Radical Cystectomy With Complete Duplication/Double Ureters.Case reports in urology · 2025Article
- Impact of neighborhood deprivation on bladder cancer outcomes: A regional analysis.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
- Synergy of PET and MR imaging in the local and regional staging of bladder cancer.Therapeutic advances in urologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIncidence and mortality for bladder cancer has changed very little over the past 20 years. Approximately 40% of patients with high-risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer eventually recur/progress. It is important to understand the economic impact of disease recurrence/progression in bladder cancer. Our aim was to estimate and understand the direct costs associated with the treatment of bladder cancer from the payer's perspective in the USA, in the year of 2021, including costs for both newly diagnosed bladder cancer (stages 0a-IV) and recurrent patients.
methodsAn economic model was constructed to calculate the number of patients receiving each treatment modality at every stage of disease and their respective costs. Epidemiological data were based on the CancerMPact Patient Metrics (PM) database and treatment modality data retrieved from CMP Treatment Architecture (TA), 2021 version. Resource utilization and costs were obtained from medical literature and public data sources. Only direct costs were considered.
resultsThere were an estimated 83,532 newly diagnosed patients with bladder cancer of all stages in 2021 with a projected total cost of treatment of ~$2.6 billion. Average cost per newly diagnosed patient varied from $19,521 (stage 0a) to $169,533 (metastatic disease). Cost profile differed substantially among the stages of disease. For the 75,760 patients that were expected to have a recurrence in 2021, an additional cost of ~$3.9 billion was estimated at an average cost per patient of $52,179. The expected total cost to treat newly diagnosed and newly recurrent patients is reported in this model, with the total cost in 2021 estimated to exceed $6.5 billion.
conclusionsTreatment and resource costs increase for bladder cancer as the disease recurs/progresses. More effective treatments that can delay recurrence/progression may reduce the economic burden associated with bladder cancer.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.