ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2025
Machine-learning models for shoulder rehabilitation exercises classification using a wearable system.
Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tele-Rehabilitation and Tele-Diagnostics in Shoulder Disorders: Current Evidence, Challenges, and Future Directions-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- IMU-based rotator cuff injury recognition with varying configurations and combinations.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Defining the Era of Shoulder Arthroscopy 2.0: A Perspective on Integrating Precision, Biology, and Smart Technology.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2026Article
- Machine-learning models for shoulder rehabilitation exercises classification using a wearable system.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Article
- Factors Influencing Rehabilitation Exercise Behavior in Elderly Rotator Cuff Repair Patients: A Qualitative Study Based on the Theory of Behavior Change Wheel.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe objective of this study is to train and test machine-learning (ML) models to automatically classify shoulder rehabilitation exercises.
methodsThe cohort included both healthy and patients with rotator-cuff (RC) tears. All participants performed six shoulder rehabilitation exercises, following guidelines developed by the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists. Each exercise was repeated six times, while wearing a wearable system equipped with three magneto-inertial sensors. Six supervised machine-learning models (k-Nearest Neighbours, Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression and Adaptive Boosting) were trained for the classification. The algorithms' ability to accurately classify exercise activities was evaluated using the nested cross-validation method, with different combinations of outer and inner folds.
resultsA total of 19 healthy subjects and 17 patients with complete RC tears were enroled in the study. The highest classification performances were achieved by the RF classifier, with an accuracy of 89.91% and an F1-score of 89.89%.
conclusionThe results of this study highlight the feasibility and effectiveness of using wearable sensors and ML algorithms to accurately classify shoulder rehabilitation exercises. These findings suggest promising prospects for implementing the proposed wearable system in remote home-based monitoring scenarios. The ease of setup and modularity of the system reduce user burden enabling patient-driven sensor positioning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.