ArticleScientific reports2024
Synthesis and quality assessment of combined time-series and static medical data using a real-world time-series generative adversarial network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study addresses challenges related to privacy issues in utilizing medical data, particularly the protection of personal information. To overcome this obstacle, the research focuses on data synthesis using real-world time-series generative adversarial networks (RTSGAN). A total of 53,005 data were synthesized using the dataset of 15,799 patients with colorectal cancer. The results of the quantitative evaluation of the synthetic data's quality are as follows: the Hellinger distance ranged from 0 to 0.25; the train on synthetic, test on real (TSTR) and train on real, test on synthetic (TRTS) results showed an average area under the curve of 0.99 and 0.98; a propensity mean squared error was 0.223. The synthetic and real data were similar in the qualitative methods including t-SNE and histogram analyses. The application of synthetic data in predicting five-year survival in colorectal cancer patients demonstrates comparable performance to models based on real data. This study employs distance to closest records and membership inference test to assess potential privacy exposure, revealing minimal risk. This study demonstrated that it is feasible to synthesize medical data, including time-series data, using the RTSGAN, and the synthetic data can be evaluated to accurately reflect the characteristics of real data through quantitative and qualitative methods as well as by utilizing real-world artificial intelligence models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.