Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39154094›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2024

Chromosome-level genome assemblies reveal genome evolution of an invasive plant Phragmites australis.

Cui Wang, Lele Liu, Meiqi Yin, Bingbing Liu, Yiming Wu, Franziska Eller, Yingqi Gao, Hans Brix, Tong Wang, Weihua Guo and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. B chromosomes put the 'super' in supernumerary.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mitochondrial Genome Insights into Evolution and Gene Regulation inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. The genome sequence of common reed,Wellcome open research · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Cui WangKey Laboratory of Ecological Prewarning, Protection and Restoration of Bohai Sea, Ministry of Natural Resources, School of Life Sciences, Shandong University, Qingdao, PR China.ORCID 0000-0003-2916-3922
Lele LiuKey Laboratory of Ecological Prewarning, Protection and Restoration of Bohai Sea, Ministry of Natural Resources, School of Life Sciences, Shandong University, Qingdao, PR China.ORCID 0000-0002-5980-0761
Meiqi YinKey Laboratory of Ecological Prewarning, Protection and Restoration of Bohai Sea, Ministry of Natural Resources, School of Life Sciences, Shandong University, Qingdao, PR China.
Bingbing LiuInstitute of Loess Plateau, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7045-9579
Yiming WuKey Laboratory of Ecological Prewarning, Protection and Restoration of Bohai Sea, Ministry of Natural Resources, School of Life Sciences, Shandong University, Qingdao, PR China.
Franziska EllerDepartment of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Yingqi GaoInstitute of Loess Plateau, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, China.ORCID 0009-0004-0673-6534
Hans BrixDepartment of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Tong WangCollege of Landscape Architecture and Forestry, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, China.
Weihua GuoKey Laboratory of Ecological Prewarning, Protection and Restoration of Bohai Sea, Ministry of Natural Resources, School of Life Sciences, Shandong University, Qingdao, PR China. whguo@sdu.edu.cn.
Jarkko SalojärviOrganismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. jarkko@ntu.edu.sg.ORCID 0000-0002-4096-6278

Funding

Academy of Finland (Suomen Akatemia) 319947National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 31800299National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32100304National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) U22A20558Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation) ZR2021QC119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological invasions pose a significant threat to ecosystems, disrupting local biodiversity and ecosystem functions. The genomic underpinnings of invasiveness, however, are still largely unknown, making it difficult to predict and manage invasive species effectively. The common reed (Phragmites australis) is a dominant grass species in wetland ecosystems and has become particularly invasive when transferred from Europe to North America. Here, we present a high-quality gap-free, telomere-to-telomere genome assembly of Phragmites australis consisting of 24 pseudochromosomes and a B chromosome. Fully phased subgenomes demonstrated considerable subgenome dominance and revealed the divergence of diploid progenitors approximately 30.9 million years ago. Comparative genomics using chromosome-level scaffolds for three other lineages and a previously published draft genome assembly of an invasive lineage revealed that gene family expansions in the form of tandem duplications may have contributed to the invasiveness of the lineage. This study sheds light on the genome evolution of Arundinoideae grasses and suggests that genetic drivers, such as gene family expansions and tandem duplications, may underly the processes of biological invasion in plants. These findings provide a crucial step toward understanding and managing the genetic basis of invasiveness in plant species.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, PlantEvolution, MolecularGenome, PlantIntroduced SpeciesPoaceaeGenomicsPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID39154094
PMCPMC11330502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.