Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39154035›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Determinants of the optimal uptake of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine doses for intermittent treatment of malaria in pregnancy in urban Nigeria.

Opeyemi Samuel Adeojo, Olufunke Fayehun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Opeyemi Samuel AdeojoDepartment of Sociology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria. opeyemi.adeojo@yahoo.com.
Olufunke FayehunDepartment of Sociology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malaria is a leading cause of maternal and child mortality in urban Nigeria. Intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP) during pregnancy can prevent malaria but uptake is suboptimal. This cross-sectional study analyzed secondary data on 1159 urban Nigerian women from the 2015 Malaria Indicator Survey using descriptive statistics and logistic regression. The primary outcome was optimal IPTp-SP uptake (≥ 3 doses). 67% of women took any SP during pregnancy but only 39% took ≥ 3 IPTp-SP doses as recommended. Region and wealth index significantly predicted optimal IPTp-SP uptake while education did not. Women from lower-income regions in the urban areas were less likely to receive optimal IPTp-SP. Strategies to increase IPTp-SP uptake in urban Nigeria should target low-income regions and women of lower socioeconomic status. Logistic regression identified actionable factors for improving antenatal malaria prevention. Optimal IPTp-SP uptake remains suboptimal across urban Nigeria, threatening maternal and child health.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsDrug CombinationsMalariaPregnancy Complications, ParasiticPyrimethamineSulfadoxineAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansNigeriaPregnancyUrban PopulationYoung AdultAntimalarialsDrug Combinationsfanasil, pyrimethamine drug combinationPyrimethamineSulfadoxine

Identifiers

PMID39154035
PMCPMC11330452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.