Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39154034›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Evaluating single multiplicative neuron models in physics-informed neural networks for differential equations.

Melih Agraz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Melih AgrazDepartment of Statistics, Giresun University, Giresun, 28200, Turkey. melih_agraz@brown.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning is a prominent and highly effective field of study, renowned for its ability to yield favorable outcomes in estimation and classification tasks. Within this domain, artificial neural networks (ANNs) have emerged as one of the most powerful methodologies. Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have proven particularly adept at solving physics problems formulated as differential equations, incorporating boundary and initial conditions into the ANN's loss function. However, a critical challenge in ANNs lies in determining the optimal architecture, encompassing the selection of the appropriate number of neurons and layers. Traditionally, the Single Multiplicative Neuron Model (SMNM) has been explored as a solution to this issue, utilizing a single neuron with a multiplication function in the hidden layer to enhance computational efficiency. This study initially aimed to apply the SMNM within the PINNs framework, targeting the differential equation

Identifiers

PMID39154034
PMCPMC11330505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.