ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2024
Improvement of temperature surveillance of neonates in low-resource settings by a simple low-cost device: a descriptive study.
Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionNeonatal hypothermia in low-resource settings is prevalent and closely associated with high morbidity and mortality. We examined if an easy-to-read temperature detector device improves health outcomes.
methodsIn a descriptive study, 1009 admissions to a neonatal ward in a tertiary care hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi, were analysed and divided into a baseline and a trial group. The data of 531 newborns with standard care (SC) before the trial were compared with 478 newborns during the implementation of the device (device care=DC). Staff and caregivers were trained on using the device and how to react in case of hypothermia. Data were collected from patient files, device documentation sheets, interviews and focus group discussions. Hypothermia was defined as a body temperature <36.5°C.
resultsDuring the trial, body temperatures throughout the hospital stay were significantly more often obtained (p<0.0001). The median temperature measurements per newborn per day were 1.3 times with SC and 1.6 times with DC, and mild hypothermia was more frequently detected. Moderate hypothermia was avoided in the lightest weight group possibly contributing to significantly shorter hospital stays of surviving newborns (p=0.007). Many caregivers had difficulties using and interpreting the device correctly, and 47% of the reported colours did not match the registered temperatures. Contrary to the above, a questionnaire and focus group discussions with caregivers and health workers showed a high acceptance and the overall opinion that the device was beneficial.
conclusionWith more frequent temperature checks, infants with lower birth weight possibly benefited from implementing an easy-to-read continuous temperature indicator, but hypothermia rates remained high. Our data and experiences reveal structural, communicational and consistency/interpretation deficits. Although specifically designed for low-resource settings, the implementation of the device needs a well-working and structured environment, especially regarding staff and caregiver communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.