Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39153482›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2024

Auditory cortex encodes lipreading information through spatially distributed activity.

Ganesan Karthik, Cody Zhewei Cao, Michael I Demidenko, Andrew Jahn, William C Stacey, Vibhangini S Wasade, David Brang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ganesan KarthikDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Cody Zhewei CaoDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Michael I DemidenkoDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Andrew JahnDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
William C StaceyDepartment of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Vibhangini S WasadeHenry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA; Department of Neurology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
David BrangDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Electronic address: djbrang@umich.edu.

Funding

Characterizing High Frequency Oscillations as an epilepsy biomarker with Big Data toolsR01NS094399 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI STACEY, WILLIAM CHARLES · 2015 to 2025
$4.1M
Characterizing the recovery of spectral, temporal, and phonemic speech information from visual cuesR01DC020717 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI David Brang · 2023 to 2026
$2.1M
Networks Underlying Visual Modulation of Speech PerceptionR00DC013828 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BRANG, DAVID · 2016 to 2018
$747k
NIDCD NIH HHS R00 DC013828NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC020717NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS094399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Watching a speaker's face improves speech perception accuracy. This benefit is enabled, in part, by implicit lipreading abilities present in the general population. While it is established that lipreading can alter the perception of a heard word, it is unknown how these visual signals are represented in the auditory system or how they interact with auditory speech representations. One influential, but untested, hypothesis is that visual speech modulates the population-coded representations of phonetic and phonemic features in the auditory system. This model is largely supported by data showing that silent lipreading evokes activity in the auditory cortex, but these activations could alternatively reflect general effects of arousal or attention or the encoding of non-linguistic features such as visual timing information. This gap limits our understanding of how vision supports speech perception. To test the hypothesis that the auditory system encodes visual speech information, we acquired functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data from healthy adults and intracranial recordings from electrodes implanted in patients with epilepsy during auditory and visual speech perception tasks. Across both datasets, linear classifiers successfully decoded the identity of silently lipread words using the spatial pattern of auditory cortex responses. Examining the time course of classification using intracranial recordings, lipread words were classified at earlier time points relative to heard words, suggesting a predictive mechanism for facilitating speech. These results support a model in which the auditory system combines the joint neural distributions evoked by heard and lipread words to generate a more precise estimate of what was said.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexLipreadingMagnetic Resonance ImagingSpeech PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleVisual PerceptionYoung AdultaudiovisualECoGiEEGmultisensorysEEGspeech

Identifiers

PMID39153482
PMCPMC11387126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.