ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2024
Age-Neutral Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures: Breaking the Ageism Barrier.
Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of early surgery (within 48 hours)Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- To fix or let them flail: the who, what and when of rib fixation.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSurgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) is associated with lower rates of mortality and fewer complications. This study evaluates whether the decision to undergo SSRF is associated with age, race, ethnicity, and insurance status and assesses associated clinical outcomes.
methodsThis retrospective analysis included patients ≥45 y old with rib fractures who underwent SSRF in the Trauma Quality Improvement Program from 2016 to 2020. Race, ethnicity, and insurance statuses were collected. Age in years was dichotomized into two groups: 45-64 and 65+. Outcomes included ventilator-associated pneumonia, unplanned endotracheal intubation, acute respiratory distress syndrome, in-hospital mortality, failure to rescue (FTR) after major complications, and FTR after respiratory complications. Logistic regression models were fit to evaluate outcomes, controlling for gender, body mass index, Injury Severity Score, flail chest, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and smoking.
resultsTwo thousand eight hundred thirty-nine patients aged 45-64 and 1828 patients aged 65+ underwent SSRF. No significant difference in clinical outcomes was noted between these groups. Analysis showed that the association of SSRF with ventilator-associated pneumonia, unplanned intubation, acute respiratory distress syndrome, in-hospital mortality, FTR after a major complication, or FTR after a respiratory complication did not vary by age (P > 0.05). Black (odds ratio [OR] 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-0.77; P < 0.001), Hispanic (OR 0.80; 95% CI: 0.71-0.91; P < 0.001), and Medicaid (OR = 0.85; 95% CI = 0.76-0.95; P = 0.005) patients were less likely to receive SSRF.
conclusionsNo differences in clinical outcomes were measured between adults aged 45-64 and ≥65 who underwent SSRF. Older age should not preclude patients from receiving SSRF. Further work is needed to improve underutilization in Black, Hispanic and Medicaid patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.