ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2024
A Scoping Review of Animal Models for Development of Abdominal Adhesion Prevention Strategies.
Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cellular and molecular regulation of fibrotic postoperative abdominal adhesions.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2026Review
- A Developmental Roadmap Toward Abdominal Adhesions Prevention Technologies.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAbdominal adhesions represent a chronic postsurgical disease without reliable prophylaxis. Animal modeling has been a cornerstone of novel therapeutic development but has not produced reliable clinical therapies for prevention of adhesive small bowel obstruction. The purpose of this scoping review is to analyze animal models for abdominal adhesion generation by key considerations of external validity (i.e., fidelity, homology, and discrimination).
methodsA literature review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Peer-reviewed publications were included that described the development or quality assessment of experimental animal models for abdominal adhesions with inclusion of a scoring system. Studies that focused on treatment evaluation, implantation of surgical devices, models of nonsurgical etiologies for abdominal adhesions, non-in vivo modeling, and investigations involving human subjects were excluded.
resultsFour hundred and fifteen (n = 415) articles were identified by prespecified search criteria. Of these, 13 studies were included for review.
conclusionsTranslation of investigational therapeutics for abdominal adhesion prevention is dependent upon high-quality experimental animal models that reproduce the clinical adhesions seen in the operating room as a disease of the entire abdomen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.