Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39153270›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2024

The effect of peanut skins as a natural antimicrobial feed additive on ileal and cecal microbiota in broiler chickens inoculated with Salmonella enterica Enteritidis.

Ondulla T Toomer, Adam K Redhead, Thien C Vu, Fernanda Santos, Ramon Malheiros, Monika Proszkowiec-Weglarz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ondulla T ToomerFood Science & Market Quality and Handling Research Unit, ARS, USDA, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA. Electronic address: Ondulla.toomer@usda.gov.
Adam K RedheadMath and Science Department, Andrew College, Cuthbert, GA 39840, USA.
Thien C VuFood Science & Market Quality and Handling Research Unit, ARS, USDA, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Fernanda SantosFood, Bioprocessing and Nutrition Sciences Dept., NC State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Ramon MalheirosPrestage Department of Poultry Science, NC State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Monika Proszkowiec-WeglarzAnimal Biosciences & Biotechnology Laboratory, ARS, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The consumption of poultry products contaminated with Salmonella species is one of the most common causes of Salmonella infections. In vivo studies demonstrated the potential application of peanut skins (PS) as an antimicrobial poultry feed additive to help mitigate the proliferation of Salmonella in poultry environments. Tons of PS, a waste by-product of the peanut industry, are generated and disposed in U.S. landfills annually. Peanut skins and extracts have been shown to possess antimicrobial and antioxidant properties. Hence, we aimed to determine the effect of PS as a feed additive on the gut microbiota of broilers fed a control or PS supplemented (4% inclusion) diet and inoculated with or without Salmonella enterica Enteritidis (SE). At hatch 160 male broilers were randomly assigned to 4 treatments: 1) CON-control diet without SE, 2) PS-PS diet without SE, 3) CONSE-control diet with SE, 4) PSSE-PS diet with SE. On d 3, birds from CONSE and PSSE treatments were inoculated with 4.2 × 10

Indexed as

Animal FeedArachisCecumChickensDietDietary SupplementsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeIleumPoultry DiseasesSalmonella enteritidisSalmonella Infections, AnimalAnimalsMaleRandom AllocationRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sbroiler chickenfunctional feed additivegut microbiotapeanut skinSalmonella

Identifiers

PMID39153270
PMCPMC11471096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.