Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39153100›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2024

EOSedge vs. standard digital radiography: image quality and dose exposure in hip-focused scanning.

Camille Parret, Fanchon Herman, Catherine Cyteval, Maxime Pastor

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05615701 (Image Quality of the EOSedge Radiographic System Versus a Standard Digital Radiographic), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05615701 naterminatednot on this map

Image Quality of the EOSedge Radiographic System Versus a Standard Digital Radiographic (DR) System for Preoperative Assessment for Hip Replacement or Revision Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, MontpellierRan2022 to 2023Enrolled97ConditionsHip Osteoarthritis, Hip Prosthesis InfectionArmsEOSedge imaging
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Camille ParretOsteoarticular Medical Imaging Section, Department of Medical Imaging, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France.
Fanchon HermanClinical Research and Epidemiology section, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France.
Catherine CytevalOsteoarticular Medical Imaging Section, Department of Medical Imaging, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France.
Maxime PastorOsteoarticular Medical Imaging Section, Department of Medical Imaging, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France. maximepastor.med@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0156-6190

Funding

Groupement Interrégional de Recherche Clinique et d'Innovation Sud-Ouest Outre-Mer Hospitalier 2022-A01532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the image quality and X-ray exposure dose from EOSedge versus standard digital radiography (SDR) focused on the hip for replacement or prosthesis revision surgery. MATERIALS &

methodsThis prospective single centre study included 97 patients between November 2022 and April 2023. For preoperative assessment, SDR radiographs from frontal pelvic and hip profile were indispensable. Often, surgeon requested spine radiograph from EOSedge, to which we added frontal pelvic and hip profile. A radiologist with 4 years' experience established a score based on European guidelines to evaluate the EOSedge versus SDR image quality. Quality scores (QS) were compared using paired Student's t test. The entrance skin dose (ESD) and dose area product (DAP) of the images were recorded.

resultsA total of 97 patients, including 49 women and 48 men (mean 68.10 years ± 13.28) were assessed. The QS

conclusionThis study highlighted the superior image quality of EOSedge images focused on the pelvis and hip compared to SDR, with significantly less radiation exposure.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipRadiation DosageRadiographic Image EnhancementAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHip JointHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRadiation ExposureEOSedgeHipRadiographyX-ray

Identifiers

PMID39153100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.