Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39153096›Full record

ArticleHead and neck pathology2024

Improving Interdisciplinary Communication and Pathology Reporting for Head and Neck Cancer Resections: 3D Visualizations and Margin Reconciliation.

Jun Yun, Danielle Kapustin, Justin Joseph, Vivian Su, Ricardo J Ramirez, Mohemmed N Khan, Raymond Chai, Michael Karasick, Christina Wiedmer, Margaret Brandwein-Weber and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Head and neck pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jun YunTHANC (Thyroid, Head & Neck Cancer) Foundation, 10 Union Square East, Suite 5B, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Danielle KapustinTHANC (Thyroid, Head & Neck Cancer) Foundation, 10 Union Square East, Suite 5B, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Justin JosephTHANC (Thyroid, Head & Neck Cancer) Foundation, 10 Union Square East, Suite 5B, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Vivian SuTHANC (Thyroid, Head & Neck Cancer) Foundation, 10 Union Square East, Suite 5B, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Ricardo J RamirezTHANC (Thyroid, Head & Neck Cancer) Foundation, 10 Union Square East, Suite 5B, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Mohemmed N KhanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 10 Union Square East, Suite 5B, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Raymond ChaiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 10 Union Square East, Suite 5B, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Michael KarasickTHANC (Thyroid, Head & Neck Cancer) Foundation, 10 Union Square East, Suite 5B, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Christina WiedmerDepartment of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Margaret Brandwein-WeberDepartment of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Mark L UrkenTHANC (Thyroid, Head & Neck Cancer) Foundation, 10 Union Square East, Suite 5B, New York, NY, 10003, USA. Markurken@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSurgical pathology reports play an integral role in postoperative management of head and neck cancer patients. Pathology reports of complex head and neck resections must convey critical information to all involved clinicians. Previously, we demonstrated the utility of 3D specimen and defect scanning for communicating margin status and documenting the location of supplemental margins. We introduce a newly designed permanent pathology report which improves documentation of intraoperative margin mapping and extent of corresponding supplemental margins harvested.

methodsWe test the hypothesis that gaps in understanding exist for head and neck resection pathology reports across providers. A cross-sectional exploratory study using human-centered design was implemented to evaluate the existing permanent pathology report with respect to understanding margin status. Pathologists, surgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists from United States-based medical institutions were surveyed. The results supported a redesign of our surgical pathology template, incorporating 3D specimen / defect scans and annotated radiographic images indicating the location of inadequate margins requiring supplemental margins, or indicating frankly positive margins discovered on permanent section.

resultsForty-seven physicians completed our survey. Analyzing surgical pathology reports, 28/47 (60%) respondents reported confusion whether re-excised supplemental margins reflected clear margins, 20/47 (43%) reported uncertainty regarding final margin status, and 20/47 (43%) reported the need for clarity regarding the extent of supplemental margins harvested intraoperatively. From this feedback, we designed a new pathology report template; 61 permanent pathology reports were compiled with this new template over a 12-month period.

conclusionFeedback from survey respondents led to a redesigned permanent pathology report that offers detailed visual anatomic information regarding intraoperative margin findings and exact location/size of harvested supplemental margins. This newly designed report reconciles frozen and permanent section results and includes annotated radiographic images such that clinicians can discern precise actions taken by surgeons to address inadequate margins, as well as to understand the location of areas of concern that may influence adjuvant radiation planning.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsMargins of ExcisionPathology, SurgicalCross-Sectional StudiesHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalInterdisciplinary Communication3D scanningFrozen sectionHuman centered designMultimedia reportSurgical pathology report

Identifiers

PMID39153096
PMCPMC11330424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.