ArticlePediatric cardiology2025
Indication for Pediatric Heart Transplant Affects Longitudinal Chronotropy on Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Pediatric Heart Transplant Recipients: Correlation with Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing.Pediatric cardiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies have suggested that pediatric patients with heart transplants (HT) due to congenital heart disease (CHD) perform differently on cardiopulmonary exercise testing compared to pediatric patients with HT due to cardiomyopathy (CM). However, it is not known if this relationship changes over time. The aim of this study was to examine the differences in cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) parameters over time between patients with HT due to CHD versus CM. A large single-institution CPET database was used for this study. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 250 total CPETs from 93 unique patients, examining how patients with HT due to CHD (109 CPETs, 40 unique patients) differed in CPET performance from patients with HT due to CM (141 CPETs, 53 unique patients) from < 2 years post-HT, 2 to < 6 years post-HT, and ≥ 6 years post-HT. There were no differences between patients with HT due to CHD compared to CM in CPETs performed < 2 years post-HT. In CPETs performed 2 to < 6 years post-HT, the CM group had higher maximal HR and percentage of age-predicted maximal heart rate (APMHR) achieved. At ≥ 6 years post-HT, the CM group continued to have higher maximal HR and percentage of APMHR achieved, but also improved HR recovery at one minute. Initial indication for transplant may affect performance on CPETs post-transplant. Patients with HT due to CM have improved chronotropic measures compared to patients with HT due to CHD and these differences are more pronounced with increased time post-HT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39153090What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.