Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39153036›Full record

ArticleCognitive processing2024

The differential illusion memory for high-associated abstract concepts (DIM-HA) effect.

Alejandro Marín-Gutiérrez, Emiliano Díez Villoria, Ana María González Martín

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive processing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alejandro Marín-Gutiérrez *Facultad de Educación y Psicología, Universidad del Atlántico Medio, Carretera de Quilmes, 37, Gran Canaria, 35017, Tafira Baja, Spain. a.marin@pdi.atlanticomedio.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2114-7736
Emiliano Díez Villoria *Departamento de Psicología Básica, Psicobiología y Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento. Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7894-3998
Ana María González Martín *Facultad de Educación y Psicología, Universidad del Atlántico Medio, Carretera de Quilmes, 37, Gran Canaria, 35017, Tafira Baja, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2802-5627

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A vast body of evidence has shown that concrete concepts are processed faster and more accurately than abstract concepts in a variety of cognitive tasks. This phenomenon is widely known as the concreteness effect, and explanations for its occurrence seem to reflect differences in processing and organization for both types of representations. While there is considerable evidence to support this concreteness effect, the nature of these differences is still controversial. In developing an explanation, we have proposed a relatively different approach from a false memory perspective using the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm. To explore the implications of the association in creating false memories, we explore behavioral and electrophysiologically the false memory effect, where targets were manipulated according to their association strength and their concreteness. Results showed that false recognition rates differed significantly between concrete and abstract critical words when they were associated strongly with their respective lists, which led to a higher proportion of abstract false alarms both in behavioral and electrophysiological experiments. The principal outcome, which was called the DIM-HA effect, was discussed in terms of theories of associative activation and qualitatively different representation.

Indexed as

Concept FormationAdultAssociationElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansIllusionsMaleMemoryReaction TimeRecognition, PsychologyYoung AdultAssociative activation theoryConcreteness effectDeese–Roediger–McDermott (DRM)DIM-HA effectQualitative difference relationship theory

Identifiers

PMID39153036
PMCPMC11541266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.