Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39152936›Full record

ArticleAdvanced healthcare materials2024

Engineering Microgel Packing to Tailor the Physical and Biological Properties of Gelatin Methacryloyl Granular Hydrogel Scaffolds.

Arian Jaberi, Alexander Kedzierski, Sina Kheirabadi, Yerbol Tagay, Zaman Ataie, Saman Zavari, Mohammad Naghashnejad, Olivia Waldron, Daksh Adhikari, Gerald Lester and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced healthcare materials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Arian JaberiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Alexander KedzierskiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Sina KheirabadiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Yerbol TagayDepartment of Pharmacology, Penn State College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.
Zaman AtaieDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Saman ZavariDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Mohammad NaghashnejadDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Olivia WaldronDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.
Daksh AdhikariDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Gerald LesterDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Colin GallagherDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Ali BorhanDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Dino RavnicDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.
Erdem TabdanovDepartment of Pharmacology, Penn State College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.
Amir SheikhiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4495-6675

Funding

Manipulation of Host Tissue to Induce a Hierarchical MicrovasculatureR01HL167939 · NHLBI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI DINO J RAVNIC, Amir Sheikhi · 2023 to 2026
$3.2M
BRAIN (Biomimetic Regenerative Angiogenic Immunomodulating Nanocomposite) materials for brain repair after strokeR01NS121150 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS · PI Lina R. Nih · 2022 to 2026
$1.4M
Huck Innovative & Transformational Seed (HITS) FundHuck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State UniversityMaterials Research Institute (MRI), The Pennsylvania State UniversityNational Heart, Lung, And Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01HL167939National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01NS121150NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL167939NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS121150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Granular hydrogel scaffolds (GHS) are fabricated via placing hydrogel microparticles (HMP) in close contact (packing), followed by physical and/or chemical interparticle bond formation. Gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) GHS have recently emerged as a promising platform for biomedical applications; however, little is known about how the packing of building blocks, physically crosslinked soft GelMA HMP, affects the physical (pore microarchitecture and mechanical/rheological properties) and biological (in vitro and in vivo) attributes of GHS. Here, the GHS pore microarchitecture is engineered via the external (centrifugal) force-induced packing and deformation of GelMA HMP to regulate GHS mechanical and rheological properties, as well as biological responses in vitro and in vivo. Increasing the magnitude and duration of centrifugal force increases the HMP deformation/packing, decreases GHS void fraction and median pore diameter, and increases GHS compressive and storage moduli. MDA-MB-231 human triple negative breast adenocarcinoma cells spread and flatten on the GelMA HMP surface in loosely packed GHS, whereas they adopt an elongated morphology in highly packed GHS as a result of spatial confinement. Via culturing untreated or blebbistatin-treated cells in GHS, the effect of non-muscle myosin II-driven contractility on cell morphology is shown. In vivo subcutaneous implantation in mice confirms a significantly higher endothelial, fibroblast, and macrophage cell infiltration within the GHS with a lower packing density, which is in accordance with the in vitro cell migration outcome. These results indicate that the packing state of GelMA GHS may enable the engineering of cell response in vitro and tissue response in vivo. This research is a fundamental step forward in standardizing and engineering GelMA GHS microarchitecture for tissue engineering and regeneration.

Indexed as

GelatinHydrogelsMethacrylatesTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsCell Line, TumorHumansMiceMicrogelsTissue EngineeringGelatingelatin methacryloylHydrogelsMethacrylatesMicrogelscell morphologydeformationGelMAgranular hydrogelhost tissue responsemicrogelporosity

Identifiers

PMID39152936
PMCPMC11828485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.