ArticleAdvanced healthcare materials2024
Engineering Microgel Packing to Tailor the Physical and Biological Properties of Gelatin Methacryloyl Granular Hydrogel Scaffolds.
Article in Advanced healthcare materials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physical continuity at biomaterial-ECM interfaces is associated with reduced fibroblast activation and NF-κB signaling.Biomaterials · 2026Article
- Mechanically graded granular scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering.Biomaterials advances · 2026Article
- Adipose-mimetic granular hydrogels uncover biophysical cues driving breast cancer invasion.Cell biomaterials · 2026Article
- Orthogonally crosslinked gelatin methacryloyl microgels for in situ assembly of granular hydrogel scaffolds.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Article
- Cross-Linking PEG Microgels with Mesoporous Organosilica Nanoparticles to Engineer Microporous Annealed Particle Scaffold Properties.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Granular Hydrogels as Modular Biomaterials: From Structural Design to Biological Responses.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Brick by Brick the Wall Is Being Built: Particle-Based Scaffolds for Regenerative Medicine.Polymers · 2025Review
- Microgel Aspect Ratio Influences Injectable Granular Hydrogel Scaffold Pore Structure and Cellular Invasion for Tissue Repair.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Multiscale Structure-Property Relationships in Gelatin-Based Granular Hydrogel Scaffolds.ACS macro letters · 2025Article
- Practical Guide to the Design of Granular Hydrogels for Customizing Complex Cellular Microenvironments.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Review
- Micropuncture and granular hydrogel scaffolds to surgically bioengineer a perfusable and stably patterned microvasculature.Angiogenesis · 2025Article
- Interparticle Crosslinked Ion-Responsive Microgels for 3D and 4D (Bio)Printing Applications.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
- A Granular Hydrogel-Enabled Wearable Electrochemical Biosensing Platform for Continuous Non-Invasive Sweat Lactate Detection.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
- Porous Hydrogels Prepared by Two-Step Gelation Method for Bone Regeneration.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Controlling Microparticle Aspect Ratio via Photolithography for Injectable Granular Hydrogel Formation and Cell Delivery.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Granular hydrogel scaffolds (GHS) are fabricated via placing hydrogel microparticles (HMP) in close contact (packing), followed by physical and/or chemical interparticle bond formation. Gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) GHS have recently emerged as a promising platform for biomedical applications; however, little is known about how the packing of building blocks, physically crosslinked soft GelMA HMP, affects the physical (pore microarchitecture and mechanical/rheological properties) and biological (in vitro and in vivo) attributes of GHS. Here, the GHS pore microarchitecture is engineered via the external (centrifugal) force-induced packing and deformation of GelMA HMP to regulate GHS mechanical and rheological properties, as well as biological responses in vitro and in vivo. Increasing the magnitude and duration of centrifugal force increases the HMP deformation/packing, decreases GHS void fraction and median pore diameter, and increases GHS compressive and storage moduli. MDA-MB-231 human triple negative breast adenocarcinoma cells spread and flatten on the GelMA HMP surface in loosely packed GHS, whereas they adopt an elongated morphology in highly packed GHS as a result of spatial confinement. Via culturing untreated or blebbistatin-treated cells in GHS, the effect of non-muscle myosin II-driven contractility on cell morphology is shown. In vivo subcutaneous implantation in mice confirms a significantly higher endothelial, fibroblast, and macrophage cell infiltration within the GHS with a lower packing density, which is in accordance with the in vitro cell migration outcome. These results indicate that the packing state of GelMA GHS may enable the engineering of cell response in vitro and tissue response in vivo. This research is a fundamental step forward in standardizing and engineering GelMA GHS microarchitecture for tissue engineering and regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.