Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39152699›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc2024

Further validation of 2 nonstructural protein-specific antibody tests for diagnosis and surveillance of foot-and-mouth disease in the United States.

Chungwon J Chung, Ryan Bagg, Kate Schumann, Leslie Blakemore, Madison Beauchamp

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chungwon J ChungUnited States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Animal Plant Health and Inspection Service (APHIS), Veterinary Services (VS), National Veterinary Service Laboratories (NVSL), Foreign Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory (FADDL), Greenport, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4525-5539
Ryan BaggUnited States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Animal Plant Health and Inspection Service (APHIS), Veterinary Services (VS), National Veterinary Service Laboratories (NVSL), Foreign Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory (FADDL), Greenport, NY, USA.
Kate SchumannUnited States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Animal Plant Health and Inspection Service (APHIS), Veterinary Services (VS), National Veterinary Service Laboratories (NVSL), Foreign Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory (FADDL), Greenport, NY, USA.
Leslie BlakemoreUnited States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Animal Plant Health and Inspection Service (APHIS), Veterinary Services (VS), National Veterinary Service Laboratories (NVSL), Foreign Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory (FADDL), Greenport, NY, USA.
Madison BeauchampUnited States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Animal Plant Health and Inspection Service (APHIS), Veterinary Services (VS), National Veterinary Service Laboratories (NVSL), Foreign Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory (FADDL), Greenport, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is a highly contagious disease of cloven-hoofed animals. FMD poses an economic threat to the livestock industry in the United States. Due to the potential use of vaccines composed of partially purified structural proteins of the FMD virus (FMDV), it is important to test samples from infected and vaccinated animals with a competitive ELISA that detects antibodies against nonstructural proteins (NSPs) of FMDV. Our study extends the diagnostic validation of the Prionics ELISA (Thermo Fisher) and the VMRD ELISA. We used diverse serum sample sets from bovine, porcine, and other cloven-hoofed animals to evaluate the analytical specificity and sensitivity, diagnostic specificity and sensitivity, and differentiation of infected from vaccinated animals (DIVA) per validation guidelines outlined by the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH). The 2 tests were analytically 100% accurate. The VMRD test was diagnostically more sensitive than Prionics, but Prionics was diagnostically more specific than the VMRD test. Both tests could tell if animals were infected or vaccinated. Considering these data, both VMRD and Prionics ELISAs can be used for serodetection of FMDV antibodies at the Foreign Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory and within the National Animal Health Laboratory Network laboratories.

Indexed as

Antibodies, ViralCattle DiseasesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFoot-and-Mouth DiseaseFoot-and-Mouth Disease VirusSensitivity and SpecificityViral Nonstructural ProteinsAnimalsCattleSwineSwine DiseasesUnited StatesAntibodies, ViralViral Nonstructural Proteinsdifferentiating between infected from vaccinated animalsDIVAELISAFMDV antibodyfoot-and-mouth diseasefoot-and-mouth disease virusnonstructural proteintest validation

Identifiers

PMID39152699
PMCPMC11520017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.