ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024
Prediction of sepsis mortality in ICU patients using machine learning methods.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Explainable AI for critical care: a systematic review of interpretable models for sepsis and ICU mortality prediction.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Prediction models for mortality in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Revolutionizing sepsis diagnosis using machine learning and deep learning models: a systematic literature review.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for early sepsis detection and dynamic prognostication in onco-critical care.World journal of critical care medicine · 2026Review
- Development and multicenter validation of machine learning models for 28-day mortality in critically ill patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- When evidence meets artificial intelligence.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Review
- Development and external validation of the HCH and HPMS prognostic indices for sepsis: a retrospective model development study using a Multi-Objective Non-Newtonian Fluid optimization algorithm.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Towards Accurate and Reliable ICU Outcome Prediction: A Multimodal Learning Framework Based on Belief Function Theory using Structured EHRs and Free-Text Notes.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2026Article
- A decision-making process to guide the potential application of a hepatitis A virus and parvovirus B19 nucleic acid test for qualifying plasma for fractionation.Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based risk prediction of 28-day mortality for sepsis patients with augmented renal clearance.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Intelligent Reasoning Cues: A Framework and Case Study of the Roles of AI Information in Complex Decisions.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2026Article
- Association between atherogenic index of plasma and hypertension in children and adolescents based on LightGBM prediction model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Synergistic effect of insulin resistance and glycemic variability on mortality in ICU patients with gastrointestinal bleeding: impact of the TyG-GVI index and development of an explainable web-based clinical calculator.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Comorbidity severity adjusted model for predicting mortality in hospitalized patients with COPD.PloS one · 2026Article
- Forest-EMCBE: an evolutionary ensemble learning algorithm for multiclass diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia using the CBC dataset.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of five nutrition-inflammation indices for predicting 28-day ICU mortality in critically ill patients with bone infections: a dual-cohort study with external validation and interpretable machine learning.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Enhancing prognostic accuracy in sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy: a machine learning approach.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- S100A12 as a key biomarker in a neutrophil-associated gene prediction model for sepsis diagnosis.Medicine · 2025Article
- Interpretable Adaptive Graph Fusion Network for Mortality and Complication Prediction in ICUs.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
problemSepsis, a life-threatening condition, accounts for the deaths of millions of people worldwide. Accurate prediction of sepsis outcomes is crucial for effective treatment and management. Previous studies have utilized machine learning for prognosis, but have limitations in feature sets and model interpretability.
aimThis study aims to develop a machine learning model that enhances prediction accuracy for sepsis outcomes using a reduced set of features, thereby addressing the limitations of previous studies and enhancing model interpretability.
methodsThis study analyzes intensive care patient outcomes using the MIMIC-IV database, focusing on adult sepsis cases. Employing the latest data extraction tools, such as Google BigQuery, and following stringent selection criteria, we selected 38 features in this study. This selection is also informed by a comprehensive literature review and clinical expertise. Data preprocessing included handling missing values, regrouping categorical variables, and using the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) to balance the data. We evaluated several machine learning models: Decision Trees, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, LightGBM, Multilayer Perceptrons (MLP), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Random Forest. The Sequential Halving and Classification (SHAC) algorithm was used for hyperparameter tuning, and both train-test split and cross-validation methodologies were employed for performance and computational efficiency.
resultsThe Random Forest model was the most effective, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.94 with a confidence interval of ±0.01. This significantly outperformed other models and set a new benchmark in the literature. The model also provided detailed insights into the importance of various clinical features, with the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and average urine output being highly predictive. SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) analysis further enhanced the model's interpretability, offering a clearer understanding of feature impacts.
conclusionThis study demonstrates significant improvements in predicting sepsis outcomes using a Random Forest model, supported by advanced machine learning techniques and thorough data preprocessing. Our approach provided detailed insights into the key clinical features impacting sepsis mortality, making the model both highly accurate and interpretable. By enhancing the model's practical utility in clinical settings, we offer a valuable tool for healthcare professionals to make data-driven decisions, ultimately aiming to minimize sepsis-induced fatalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.