ArticleBMC surgery2024
Risk factors of textbook outcome in laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: results from a prospective high-volume center study.
Article in BMC surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on: "textbook outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients: age-stratified analysis and predictive factors".Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Factors associated with textbook outcome after robotic-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy: a single surgeon's retrospective cohort.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2026Article
- Textbook outcome following surgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: retrospective study.BJS open · 2025Article
- Laparoscopic versus robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma after learning curves of surgeons: a multicenter propensity score-matched study.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2025Article
- [Clinical Practice and Quality Control Strategies for Complex Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025Review
- Comparison of laparoscopic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma and impact factors on textbook outcome.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAchieving textbook outcome (TO) implies a smooth recovery post-operation without specified composite complications. This study aimed to evaluate TO in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) and identify independent risk factors associated with achieving TO.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial on LPD at West China Hospital (ChiCTR1900026653). Patients were categorized into the TO and non-TO groups. Perioperative variables were compared between these groups. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to identify the risk factors.
resultsA total of 200 consecutive patients undergoing LPD were included in this study. TO was achieved in 82.5% (n = 165) of the patients. Female patients (OR: 2.877, 95% CI: 1.219-6.790; P = 0.016) and those with a hard pancreatic texture (OR: 2.435, 95% CI: 1.018-5.827; P = 0.046) were associated with an increased likelihood of achieving TO.
conclusionsTO can be achieved in more than 80% of patients in a high-volume LPD center. Independent risk factors associated with achieving TO included gender (male) and pancreatic texture (soft).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.