Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39152290›Full record

ReviewInfection2024

The application status of sequencing technology in global respiratory infectious disease diagnosis.

Jingyuan Chen, Zhen Qin, Zhongwei Jia

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Infection, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Influenza.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Infection and drug resistance · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jingyuan Chen *Department of Global Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Zhen Qin *School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Zhongwei JiaDepartment of Global Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China. urchinjj@163.com.

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation INV-045088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has revolutionized clinical microbiology, particularly in diagnosing respiratory infectious diseases and conducting epidemiological investigations. This narrative review summarizes conventional methods for routine respiratory infection diagnosis, including culture, smear microscopy, immunological assays, image techniques as well as polymerase chain reaction(PCR). In contrast to conventional methods, there is a new detection technology, sequencing technology, and here we mainly focus on the next-generation sequencing NGS, especially metagenomic NGS(mNGS). NGS offers significant advantages over traditional methods. Firstly, mNGS eliminates assumptions about pathogens, leading to faster and more accurate results, thus reducing diagnostic time. Secondly, it allows unbiased identification of known and novel pathogens, offering broad-spectrum coverage. Thirdly, mNGS not only identifies pathogens but also characterizes microbiomes, analyzes human host responses, and detects resistance genes and virulence factors. It can complement targeted sequencing for bacterial and fungal classification. Unlike traditional methods affected by antibiotics, mNGS is less influenced due to the extended survival of pathogen DNA in plasma, broadening its applicability. However, barriers to full integration into clinical practice persist, primarily due to cost constraints and limitations in sensitivity and turnaround time. Despite these challenges, ongoing advancements aim to improve cost-effectiveness and efficiency, making NGS a cornerstone technology for global respiratory infection diagnosis.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingRespiratory Tract InfectionsHumansMetagenomicsMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMetagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS)Next-generation sequencing (NGS)Respiratory infectious diseasesSequencing technology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.