Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39152271›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2024

Intestinal microbiology and urinary tract infection associated risk in long-term aged care residents.

Sophie J Miller, Lucy Carpenter, Steven L Taylor, Steve L Wesselingh, Jocelyn M Choo, Andrew P Shoubridge, Lito E Papanicolas, Geraint B Rogers, GRACE Investigator Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. UropathogenicMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sophie J MillerMicrobiome and Host Health, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-3889-7941
Lucy CarpenterMicrobiome and Host Health, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Steven L TaylorMicrobiome and Host Health, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4357-8243
Steve L WesselinghMicrobiome and Host Health, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Jocelyn M ChooMicrobiome and Host Health, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Andrew P ShoubridgeMicrobiome and Host Health, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5148-4063
Lito E Papanicolas *Microbiome and Host Health, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Geraint B Rogers *Microbiome and Host Health, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. geraint.rogers@sahmri.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4054-1947
GRACE Investigator Group

Funding

Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) GNT1152268
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrinary tract infections (UTI) are the most frequently diagnosed infection in residents of long-term care and are a major risk factor for urosepsis, hospitalisation, and death. Translocation of gut pathobionts into the urinary tract is the presumed cause of most UTIs. While specific gut microbiota characteristics have been linked to UTI risk in younger adults, their relevance in aged care residents remains uncertain.

methodsThe faecal microbiome was assessed in 54 long-term aged care residents with a history of UTIs and 69 residents without a UTI history. Further comparisons were made to microbiome characteristics in 20 younger adults without UTIs. Microbiome characteristics were examined in relation to prior and subsequent UTIs, as well as antibiotic therapy.

resultsIn long-term aged care residents, prior UTI history and exposure to UTI-exclusive antibiotics do not significantly affect microbiome composition or functional capacity. However, exposure to antibiotics unrelated to UTI treatment is associated with distinct microbiota compositional traits. Adjustment for dementia, incontinence, diabetes, and prior antibiotic use finds no microbiota characteristic linked to UTI development. However, prior UTI is identified as a predictor of future UTIs. Comparison with younger adults identifies greater within-participant dispersion in aged care residents, as well as lower microbiota diversity and altered microbiome functional potential.

conclusionsNo association between the gut microbiome and UTI incidence, as has been reported in younger individuals, is evident in long-term aged care residents. Considerable variability in gut microbiome characteristics, relating to high antibiotic exposure and age-related physiological and immunological factors, could mask such a relationship. However, it cannot be discounted that increased UTI risk in the elderly is independent of microbiome-mediated mechanisms.

Identifiers

PMID39152271
PMCPMC11329762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.