ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2024
Long-term patient reported outcome measures and kneeling function in patients with tibial intramedullary nails.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAnterior knee pain (AKP) is a common complaint following intramedullary nail (IMN) insertion for tibial shaft fractures. There is a lack of long-term patient reported outcome data following tibial IMN, with conflicting evidence of the role of nail protrusion on AKP. In this study, we assess the long-term patient reported outcome measures and kneeling function in patients with tibial IMNs and compare the results with IMN protrusion, measured radiologically. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective cohort of 128 patients, from a single UK centre, were invited to participate in the study, to complete a Kujala score, KOOS, EQ-5D-5L and a four-posture kneeling assessment. We report the outcomes of 45 patients at an average follow-up of 6.9 years.
resultsThe mean Kujala score was 80.7. The mean KOOS score was 83.2, 83.9, 85.8, 70.7 and 72.8 for symptoms, pain, daily living, sport and quality of life, respectively. We found 20.5% of patients experienced daily AKP. Pain and fear of pain were the most common limiting factors in the kneeling assessment. No significant correlation was found between the KOOS or Kujala score and nail-plateau distance, nail-anterior cortex distance, or the overall nail prominence.
conclusionAKP affects a subset of patients more than five years post-tibial IMN, limiting their ability to kneel and other functions of daily living. Tibial IMN prominence does not seem to be associated with AKP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39152211What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.