Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39152206›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Chaotic self-adaptive sine cosine multi-objective optimization algorithm to solve microgrid optimal energy scheduling problems.

N Karthik, Arul Rajagopalan, Mohit Bajaj, Palash Medhi, R Kanimozhi, Vojtech Blazek, Lukas Prokop

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

N KarthikDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Hindustan Institute of Technology and Science, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
Arul RajagopalanCentre for Smart Grid Technologies, School of Electrical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India. arulphd@yahoo.co.in.
Mohit BajajElectrical Engineering Department, Graphic Era (Deemed to be University), Dehradun, 248002, India. thebestbajaj@gmail.com.
Palash MedhiDepartment of Energy, Tezpur University, Tezpur, Assam, India.
R KanimozhiDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, Chidambaram, Tamilnadu, India.
Vojtech BlazekENET Centre, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Lukas ProkopENET Centre, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00, Ostrava, Czech Republic.

Funding

Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports TN02000025 National Centre for Energy IIMinistry of the Environment of the Czech Republic CZ.10.03.01/00/22_003/0000048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Researchers are increasingly focusing on renewable energy due to its high reliability, energy independence, efficiency, and environmental benefits. This paper introduces a novel multi-objective framework for the short-term scheduling of microgrids (MGs), which addresses the conflicting objectives of minimizing operating expenses and reducing pollution emissions. The core contribution is the development of the Chaotic Self-Adaptive Sine Cosine Algorithm (CSASCA). This algorithm generates Pareto optimal solutions simultaneously, effectively balancing cost reduction and emission mitigation. The problem is formulated as a complex multi-objective optimization task with goals of cost reduction and environmental protection. To enhance decision-making within the algorithm, fuzzy logic is incorporated. The performance of CSASCA is evaluated across three scenarios: (1) PV and wind units operating at full power, (2) all units operating within specified limits with unrestricted utility power exchange, and (3) microgrid operation using only non-zero-emission energy sources. This third scenario highlights the algorithm's efficacy in a challenging context not covered in prior research. Simulation results from these scenarios are compared with traditional Sine Cosine Algorithm (SCA) and other recent optimization methods using three test examples. The innovation of CSASCA lies in its chaotic self-adaptive mechanisms, which significantly enhance optimization performance. The integration of these mechanisms results in superior solutions for operation cost, emissions, and execution time. Specifically, CSASCA achieves optimal values of 590.45 €ct for cost and 337.28 kg for emissions in the first scenario, 98.203 €ct for cost and 406.204 kg for emissions in the second scenario, and 95.38 €ct for cost and 982.173 kg for emissions in the third scenario. Overall, CSASCA outperforms traditional SCA by offering enhanced exploration, improved convergence, effective constraint handling, and reduced parameter sensitivity, making it a powerful tool for solving multi-objective optimization problems like microgrid scheduling.

Indexed as

Energy managementMicro-grid (MG)Multi-objective optimizationPhotovoltaic (PV)Renewable energy sources (RESs)Sine cosine algorithmWind turbine (WT)

Identifiers

PMID39152206
PMCPMC11329649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.