Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39152193›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Acoustic scene complexity affects motion behavior during speech perception in audio-visual multi-talker virtual environments.

Valeska Slomianka, Torsten Dau, Axel Ahrens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Valeska SlomiankaHearing Systems Section, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, 2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark. vaslo@dtu.dk.ORCID 0009-0002-4664-367X
Torsten DauHearing Systems Section, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, 2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Axel AhrensHearing Systems Section, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, 2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8800-2497

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In real-world listening situations, individuals typically utilize head and eye movements to receive and enhance sensory information while exploring acoustic scenes. However, the specific patterns of such movements have not yet been fully characterized. Here, we studied how movement behavior is influenced by scene complexity, varied in terms of reverberation and the number of concurrent talkers. Thirteen normal-hearing participants engaged in a speech comprehension and localization task, requiring them to indicate the spatial location of a spoken story in the presence of other stories in virtual audio-visual scenes. We observed delayed initial head movements when more simultaneous talkers were present in the scene. Both reverberation and a higher number of talkers extended the search period, increased the number of fixated source locations, and resulted in more gaze jumps. The period preceding the participants' responses was prolonged when more concurrent talkers were present, and listeners continued to move their eyes in the proximity of the target talker. In scenes with more reverberation, the final head position when making the decision was farther away from the target. These findings demonstrate that the complexity of the acoustic scene influences listener behavior during speech comprehension and localization in audio-visual scenes.

Indexed as

Eye MovementsSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultComprehensionFemaleHead MovementsHumansMaleSound LocalizationVirtual RealityVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39152193
PMCPMC11329770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.