Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39151997›Full record

ReviewSeminars in vascular surgery2024

Appropriateness of care: Asymptomatic carotid stenosis including transcarotid artery revascularization.

Jesse A Columbo, David H Stone

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in vascular surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jesse A ColumboGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH; Section of Vascular Surgery, 3V, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03766; Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT. Electronic address: Jesse.A.Columbo@Hitchcock.org.
David H StoneGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH; Section of Vascular Surgery, 3V, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03766; Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT.

Funding

Comparative-Effectiveness of Procedures for Carotid RevascularizationK08HL165087 · NHLBI · DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK CLINIC · PI Jesse A Columbo · 2023 to 2026
$587k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL165087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carotid artery stenosis is one of the most common diagnoses treated by vascular specialists in the United States. The optimal management of carotid stenosis remains controversial, however, with notable variation surrounding diagnostic imaging modalities, longitudinal surveillance, medical therapies, and procedural interventions. Data from high-quality randomized controlled trials and observational studies form the foundation for current management paradigms and societal guidelines that inform clinical practice. Presently, a diagnosis of carotid disease is most often established with duplex ultrasound and supplemental cross-sectional imaging using computed tomography or magnetic resonance angiography as needed to provide additional anatomic information. All patients with documented occlusive disease should receive goal-directed medical therapy with antiplatelet agents and a lipid-reduction strategy, most commonly with a statin. Those with severe carotid stenosis and an acceptable life expectancy may be considered for carotid artery revascularization. The proceduralist should optimally consider a shared decision-making approach in which the tradeoffs of revascularization can be carefully considered with the patient to optimize informed therapeutic decision making. In current practice, three distinct procedure options exist to treat carotid artery stenosis, including carotid endarterectomy, transfemoral carotid artery stenting, and transcarotid artery revascularization. It should be noted that each procedure, although often used interchangeably in most clinical settings, carry technical nuances and outcome disparities. In this review, each of these topics are explored and various approaches are outlined surrounding the appropriate use of treatments for patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

Indexed as

Asymptomatic DiseasesCarotid StenosisEndarterectomy, CarotidEndovascular ProceduresPatient SelectionStentsClinical Decision-MakingDecision Making, SharedHumansPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPredictive Value of TestsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomePlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsCarotid stenosisCarotid stentingEndarterectomyMedical therapyTCAR

Identifiers

PMID39151997
PMCPMC11330557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.