ReviewEpigenetics2024
Genome-wide methylation analysis in patients with proximal hypospadias - a pilot study and review of the literature.
Review in Epigenetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Susceptibility and Pathogenesis of Hypospadias.Biochemical genetics · 2026Review
- Genetic, Epigenetic, and Non-Genetic Factors in Testicular Dysgenesis Syndrome: A Narrative Review.Genes · 2025Review
- Epigenetic Signatures in Hypospadias: Systematic Review.Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In patients with proximal hypospadias, often no genetic cause is identified despite extensive genetic testing. Many genes involved in sex development encode transcription factors with strict timing and dosing of the gene products. We hypothesised that there might be recurrent differences in DNA methylation in boys with hypospadias and that these might differ between patients born small versus appropriate for gestational age. Genome-wide Methylated DNA sequencing (MeD-seq) was performed on 32bp LpnPI restriction enzyme fragments after RE-digestion in leucocytes from 16 XY boys with unexplained proximal hypospadias, one with an unexplained XX testicular disorder/difference of sex development (DSD) and twelve, healthy, sex- and age-matched controls. Five of seven differentially methylated regions (DMRs) between patients and XY controls were in the Long Intergenic Non-Protein Coding RNA 665 (LINC00665; CpG24525). Three patients showed hypermethylation of MAP3K1. Finally, no DMRs in XX testicular DSD associated genes were identified in the XX boy versus XX controls. In conclusion, we observed no recognizable epigenetic signature in 16 boys with XY proximal hypospadias and no difference between children born small versus appropriate for gestational age. Comparison to previous methylation studies in individuals with hypospadias did not show consistent findings, possibly due to the use of different inclusion criteria, tissues and methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.