Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39150935›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Intimate partner violence in Nepal: Analysis of Nepal Demographic and Health Survey 2022.

Parash Mani Sapkota, Achyut Raj Pandey, Bikram Adhikari, Grishu Shrestha, Reecha Piya, Bipul Lamichhane, Shristi Garu, Deepak Joshi, Sushil Chandra Baral

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Parash Mani SapkotaResearch, Evaluation and Innovation Department, HERD International, Lalitpur, Nepal.ORCID 0009-0005-7433-9239
Achyut Raj PandeyResearch, Evaluation and Innovation Department, HERD International, Lalitpur, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-1037-1273
Bikram AdhikariResearch, Evaluation and Innovation Department, HERD International, Lalitpur, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-4299-9233
Grishu ShresthaResearch, Evaluation and Innovation Department, HERD International, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Reecha PiyaResearch, Evaluation and Innovation Department, HERD International, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Bipul LamichhaneResearch, Evaluation and Innovation Department, HERD International, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Shristi GaruManmohan Memorial Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Deepak JoshiResearch, Evaluation and Innovation Department, HERD International, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Sushil Chandra BaralResearch, Evaluation and Innovation Department, HERD International, Lalitpur, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-3425-6915

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntimate partner violence (IPV) is a major public health issue in Nepal. IPV has social and economic impacts on women, family, and the wider society. In this study, we aimed to determine factors associated with IPV among currently partnered women aged 15-49.

methodsWe conducted a secondary data analysis of the Nepal Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) 2022. The study examines the lifetime prevalence of IPV. IPV was measured in three domains: experience of physical violence, emotional violence, and sexual violence. Weighted univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis were applied to determine factors associated with IPV. The results of logistic regression were presented as crude odds ratio (COR) and adjusted odds ratio (AOR) and their 95% confidence interval (CI).

resultsOf 3853 women, 27.2% had experienced any form of IPV. The lifetime prevalence of physical violence, emotional violence, and sexual violence were 23.2%, 12.8%, and 7.1%, respectively. Higher odds of physical violence were reported among women aged 35-49 years (AOR: 2.13, 95% CI: 1.58-2.87), women without formal education (AOR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.10-2.06), and women who justified wife-beating (AOR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.00-1.52). Women from poor households (AOR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.12-2.35) and women with uneducated partners (AOR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.08-2.58) were at higher risk of experiencing sexual violence. Women with unemployed husbands reported a higher risk of physical violence (AOR: 2.72, 95% CI: 1.45-5.06) and emotional violence (AOR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.12-2.35).

conclusionAlmost one in three currently partnered women experienced some form of IPV in their lifetime. Various sociodemographic, partner-related, and women's empowerment-related factors were associated with experiencing IPV. Acknowledging and addressing these factors is essential to mitigating the high rates of IPV among reproductive aged women.

Indexed as

Health SurveysIntimate Partner ViolenceAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNepalOdds RatioPrevalenceRisk FactorsSex OffensesSexual PartnersSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID39150935
PMCPMC11329113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.