Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39150914›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Barcamps or unconferences as an emerging paradigm in medical education: Insights from a pilot and feasibility mixed methods study.

Bernd F M Romeike, Johannes Lang, Christoph Stosch, Sören Moritz, Marianne Behrends, Martin Lemos, Johanna Mink, Daniel Tolks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bernd F M RomeikeDean's Office for Student Affairs, Medical Education, University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9693-3870
Johannes LangMedical Faculty, Giessen University, Giessen, Germany.
Christoph StoschStudent Deans Office, Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne, Köln, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1001-4310
Sören MoritzStudent Deans Office, Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne, Köln, Germany.
Marianne BehrendsPeter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics of TU Braunschweig and Hannover Medical School, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Martin LemosAudiovisual Media Center, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0788-2400
Johanna MinkDepartment of Primary Care and Health Services Research, Nursing Science and Interprofessional Care, Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Daniel TolksCenter for Applied Health Science, Leuphana University Lueneburg, Lueneburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical education is experiencing a paradigm shift towards more interactive and collaborative pedagogical approaches. Barcamps, also known as unconferences, offer an interactive, participant-driven learning approach. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of using barcamps as an educational model in medical education. Furthermore, the possibility of establishing barcamps in medical education as a pedagogical tool is discussed. The study integrates two evaluations to achieve a multifaceted understanding: a pilot study conducted in 2022 and a subsequent feasibility study in 2023. Participation in the barcamps and their evaluations was voluntary. We combined quantitative data, primarily from post-event evaluations, and qualitative data from open-ended survey questions. These methods were designed to capture a broad range of participant experiences and perceptions. The pilot study in 2022 included 11 participants and produced a response rate for the evaluations. The feasibility study in 2023 had 34 participants but a lower evaluation response rate of 53%. Both barcamps were generally positively evaluated by the participants, indicating a high level of satisfaction and perceived value. Regarding the active participation of participants, the wide range of presented topics highlights the adaptability and flexibility of the barcamp model. Attendees at the pilot mentioned a significantly higher previous experience with barcamps. The study suggests that barcamps are generally well received as an interactive and collaborative educational tool in medical education, reflected by high participant evaluation scores. The wide range of topics presented and discussed indicates that barcamps can accommodate diverse educational needs and interests. However, the study also identified areas for improvement, most notably in the structure of topic plans and the overall learning environment. Finally, the principals for barcamps might adapt to other educational methods by adding more interaction, choice, collaboration, communication, critical thinking, creativity, and caring to the learning process.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalFeasibility StudiesAdultFemaleHumansLearningMaleModels, EducationalPilot ProjectsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39150914
PMCPMC11329116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.