ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2024
SPRank─A Knowledge-Based Scoring Function for RNA-Ligand Pose Prediction and Virtual Screening.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Critical Assessment of a Structure-Based Pipeline for Targeting the Long Noncoding RNA MALAT1.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Article
- RLDOCKScore: A Scoring Function for RNA-Ligand Docking and Small Molecule Virtual Screening.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The growing interest in RNA-targeted drugs underscores the need for computational modeling of interactions between RNA molecules and small compounds. Having a reliable scoring function for RNA-ligand interactions is essential for effective computational drug screening. An ideal scoring function should not only predict the native pose for ligand binding but also rank the affinity of the binding for different ligands. However, existing scoring functions are primarily designed to predict the native binding modes for a given RNA-ligand pair and have not been thoroughly assessed for virtual screening purposes. In this paper, we introduce SPRank, a combination of machine-learning and knowledge-based scoring functions developed through a weighted iterative approach, specifically designed to tackle both binding mode prediction and virtual screening challenges. Our approach incorporates third-party docking software, such as rDock and AutoDock Vina, to sample flexible ligands against an ensemble of RNA structures, capturing the conformational flexibility of both the RNA and the ligand. Through rigorous testing, SPRank demonstrates improved performance compared to the tested scoring functions across four test sets comprising 122, 42, 55, and 71 nucleic acid-ligand complexes. Furthermore, SPRank exhibits improved performance in virtual screening tests targeting the HIV-1 TAR ensemble, which highlights its advantage in drug discovery. These results underscore the advantages of SPRank as a potentially promising tool for the RNA-targeted drug design. The source code of SPRank and the data sets are freely accessible at https://github.com/Vfold-RNA/SPRank.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.