ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024
Uncovering underlying physical principles and driving forces of cell differentiation and reprogramming from single-cell transcriptomics.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating delivery systems and microenvironmental cues to accelerate clinical translation of cardiac reprogramming.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Condensates and cell states: A new paradigm for understanding tumor biology.Biophysical journal · 2026Review
- Learning stochastic dynamics and cell-fate landscapes from single-cell snapshots via optimal transport.Science advances · 2026Article
- Multiscale learning of gene network-driven phenotypic dynamics of single cells.Molecular systems biology · 2026Article
- Spatial biology of crowded tumor cells: A new map for designing drug combinations.Current opinion in structural biology · 2026Review
- Allostery in Biomolecular Condensates.Journal of molecular biology · 2026Review
- Deciphering cell-fate trajectories using spatiotemporal single-cell transcriptomic data.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Review
- Quantifying Landscape and Flux from Single-Cell Omics: Unraveling the Physical Mechanisms of Cell Function.JACS Au · 2025Review
- Integrating Dynamical Systems Modeling with Spatiotemporal scRNA-Seq Data Analysis.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Should Artificial Intelligence Play a Durable Role in Biomedical Research and Practice?International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advances in single-cell sequencing technology have revolutionized our ability to acquire whole transcriptome data. However, uncovering the underlying transcriptional drivers and nonequilibrium driving forces of cell function directly from these data remains challenging. We address this by learning cell state vector fields from discrete single-cell RNA velocity to quantify the single-cell global nonequilibrium driving forces as landscape and flux. From single-cell data, we quantified the Waddington landscape, showing that optimal paths for differentiation and reprogramming deviate from the naively expected landscape gradient paths and may not pass through landscape saddles at finite fluctuations, challenging conventional transition state estimation of kinetic rate for cell fate decisions due to the presence of the flux. A key insight from our study is that stem/progenitor cells necessitate greater energy dissipation for rapid cell cycles and self-renewal, maintaining pluripotency. We predict optimal developmental pathways and elucidate the nucleation mechanism of cell fate decisions, with transition states as nucleation sites and pioneer genes as nucleation seeds. The concept of loop flux quantifies the contributions of each cycle flux to cell state transitions, facilitating the understanding of cell dynamics and thermodynamic cost, and providing insights into optimizing biological functions. We also infer cell-cell interactions and cell-type-specific gene regulatory networks, encompassing feedback mechanisms and interaction intensities, predicting genetic perturbation effects on cell fate decisions from single-cell omics data. Essentially, our methodology validates the landscape and flux theory, along with its associated quantifications, offering a framework for exploring the physical principles underlying cellular differentiation and reprogramming and broader biological processes through high-throughput single-cell sequencing experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.