Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39150785›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Uncovering underlying physical principles and driving forces of cell differentiation and reprogramming from single-cell transcriptomics.

Ligang Zhu, Songlin Yang, Kun Zhang, Hong Wang, Xiaona Fang, Jin Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Allostery in Biomolecular Condensates.Journal of molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ligang ZhuCollege of Physics, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.ORCID 0009-0000-3553-2320
Songlin YangState Key Laboratory of Electroanalytical Chemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130022, China.
Kun ZhangState Key Laboratory of Electroanalytical Chemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130022, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5986-4511
Hong WangState Key Laboratory of Electroanalytical Chemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130022, China.
Xiaona FangCollege of Chemistry, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China.
Jin WangCenter for Theoretical Interdisciplinary Sciences, Wenzhou Institute, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wenzhou 325001, China.

Funding

MOST | National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) 12234019MOST | National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) 21721003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in single-cell sequencing technology have revolutionized our ability to acquire whole transcriptome data. However, uncovering the underlying transcriptional drivers and nonequilibrium driving forces of cell function directly from these data remains challenging. We address this by learning cell state vector fields from discrete single-cell RNA velocity to quantify the single-cell global nonequilibrium driving forces as landscape and flux. From single-cell data, we quantified the Waddington landscape, showing that optimal paths for differentiation and reprogramming deviate from the naively expected landscape gradient paths and may not pass through landscape saddles at finite fluctuations, challenging conventional transition state estimation of kinetic rate for cell fate decisions due to the presence of the flux. A key insight from our study is that stem/progenitor cells necessitate greater energy dissipation for rapid cell cycles and self-renewal, maintaining pluripotency. We predict optimal developmental pathways and elucidate the nucleation mechanism of cell fate decisions, with transition states as nucleation sites and pioneer genes as nucleation seeds. The concept of loop flux quantifies the contributions of each cycle flux to cell state transitions, facilitating the understanding of cell dynamics and thermodynamic cost, and providing insights into optimizing biological functions. We also infer cell-cell interactions and cell-type-specific gene regulatory networks, encompassing feedback mechanisms and interaction intensities, predicting genetic perturbation effects on cell fate decisions from single-cell omics data. Essentially, our methodology validates the landscape and flux theory, along with its associated quantifications, offering a framework for exploring the physical principles underlying cellular differentiation and reprogramming and broader biological processes through high-throughput single-cell sequencing experiments.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCellular ReprogrammingSingle-Cell AnalysisTranscriptomeAnimalsGene Expression ProfilingHumanscell differentiationlandscape–flux theoryRNA velocitysingle-cell transcriptomicstransition states

Identifiers

PMID39150785
PMCPMC11348339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.