ArticleACS infectious diseases2024
Efficient and Selective, In Vitro and In Vivo, Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy with a Dicationic Chlorin in Combination with KI.
Article in ACS infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Selective Photodisinfection of Bacteria and Biofilms Using Blue Light-Activated Molybdenum Nanoclusters via Dual Singlet Oxygen and Hydroxyl Radical Sensitization.Inorganic chemistry · 2026Article
- Siderophore-Porphyrin conjugates for bacteria-selective antimicrobial photodynamic therapy.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026Article
- Biomolecule-Photosensitizer Conjugates: A Strategy to Enhance Selectivity and Therapeutic Efficacy in Photodynamic Therapy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Selective antimicrobial photodynamic therapy of clinical isolates from patients with infected diabetic foot ulcers using a small cationic chlorin.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025Article
- Light-based therapy of infected wounds: a review of dose considerations for photodynamic microbial inactivation and photobiomodulation.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Various cationic photosensitizers employed in antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) have the ability to photoinactivate planktonic bacteria under conditions of low phototoxicity to mammalian cells and without generating antimicrobial resistance (AMR). However, the photoinactivation of biofilms requires orders-of-magnitude higher photosensitizer concentrations, which become toxic to host cells. Remarkably, the bactericidal effect of a dicationic di-imidazolyl chlorin toward planktonic
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.