Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39150710›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Perceived Parental Distraction by Technology and Mental Health Among Emerging Adolescents.

Audrey-Ann Deneault, André Plamondon, Ross D Neville, Rachel Eirich, Brae Anne McArthur, Suzanne Tough, Sheri Madigan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Audrey-Ann DeneaultDépartement de Psychologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
André PlamondonFaculté des Sciences de L'Éducation, Université Laval, Quebec City, Québec, Canada.
Ross D NevilleSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Rachel EirichDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Brae Anne McArthurDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Suzanne ToughAlberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, Canada.
Sheri MadiganDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The digital phenomenon termed technoference refers to interruptions in routine social interactions due to technology use. Technoference may negatively affect parents' attention to cues necessary for supporting children's mental health. Objective: To explore whether there are directional prospective associations between perceived parental technoference and emerging adolescents' mental health symptoms (anxiety, depression, inattention, and hyperactivity). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study assessed a general population of mothers and emerging adolescents in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Women were recruited during pregnancy between May 3, 2008, and December 13, 2010, with convenience sampling and repeated follow-up; eligible women were 18 years or older, spoke English, had a gestational age of at least 24 weeks, and received local prenatal care. Data collection for the present study took place when emerging adolescents were aged 9 (May 20 to July 15, 2020), 10 (March 4 to April 30, 2021), and 11 (November 22, 2021, to January 17, 2022) years. Mothers provided consent for their child to participate, and emerging adolescents provided assent. Data were analyzed from December 1 to 31, 2023, using random-intercept cross-lagged panel models. Exposure: Perceived parental technoference. Main Outcomes and Measures: Emerging adolescents completed questionnaires about their perception of parental technoference and their mental health symptoms (depression, anxiety, hyperactivity, and inattention) at the 3 study times. This study did not rely on statistical significance, but instead on the magnitude of effect sizes to determine meaningful effects. Results: Participants included 1303 emerging adolescents (mean [SD] age, 9.7 [0.8] years at time 1; of the 1028 reporting information, 529 [51.5%] were girls). Cross-sectional associations indicated correlations between perceptions of parental technoference and emerging adolescents' mental health (r range, 0.17-0.19). Higher levels of anxiety at 9 and 10 years of age were prospectively associated with higher parental technoference scores at 10 (β = 0.11 [95% CI, -0.05 to 0.26]) and 11 (β = 0.12 [95% CI, 0.001-0.24]) years of age, with small magnitudes of effect size. Higher parental technoference scores at 9 and 10 years of age were prospectively associated with higher hyperactivity at 10 (β = 0.07 [95% CI, -0.07 to 0.22]) and 11 (β = 0.11 [95% CI, -0.02 to 0.24]) years of age and inattention at 11 years of age (β = 0.12 [95% CI, 0.001-0.24]), with small magnitudes of effect size. No gender differences were identified. Conclusions and Relevance: In this 3-wave longitudinal birth cohort study, perceived parental technoference was associated with emerging adolescents' mental health. The findings speak to the need to discuss digital technology use and mental health with parents and emerging adolescents as a part of routine care.

Indexed as

Mental HealthAdolescentAdultAlbertaAnxietyAttentionChildCohort StudiesDepressionFemaleHumansMaleParent-Child RelationsParentsProspective StudiesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39150710
PMCPMC11329881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.