ArticleJAMA network open2024
Abiraterone or Enzalutamide for Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and Safety Differences Between Abiraterone and Enzalutamide in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Real-World Studies.Targeted oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of Cardio-cerebrovascular Diseases on Enzalutamide and Abiraterone Treatment in Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.JMA journal · 2026Trial
- The Lowest PSA Level Achieved Before CRPC Predicts Abiraterone Response But Not Enzalutamide Response in Metastatic CRPC.The Prostate · 2026Trial
- Sequential Enzalutamide-Docetaxel Versus Abiraterone-Docetaxel Therapy in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Subanalysis of the ENABLE Study.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026Trial
- Enzalutamide-Induced Host Metabolic Reprogramming Is Associated with Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Hypothesis-Generating Study.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Editorial Comment on Efficacy and Safety of Enzalutamide and Abiraterone in CRPC Patients With a History of Other Cancers: A Sub-Analysis of the ENABLE Study for PCa.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026Article
- Designing a molecularly imprinted polymer sensor for sensitive and selective detection of the prostate cancer drug Abiraterone acetate.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- CRLF1 Drives Prostate Cancer Progression via COMP-Mediated Activation of the FAK/PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathway.Cancers · 2026Article
- Docetaxel Rechallenge vs Cabazitaxel in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Abiraterone vs Enzalutamide Among US Veterans With Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Battlegrounds of treatment resistance: decoding the tumor microenvironment.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Review
- Unplanned hospitalization among advanced prostate cancer patients by diabetes status: a population-based study.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2025Article
- Real-World Overall Survival Comparison of Enzalutamide and Abiraterone In First- and Second-Line Setting of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.The Prostate · 2025Article
- PROTAC technology for prostate cancer treatment.Acta materia medica · 2025Article
- Characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of patients with metastatic prostate cancer during 2014-2022 in Pirkanmaa, Finland-an observational study.Therapeutic advances in urologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide are recommended as preferred treatments for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but differences in their relative efficacy are unclear due to a lack of head-to-head clinical trials. Clear guidance is needed for making informed mCRPC therapeutic choices. Objective: To compare clinical outcomes in patients with mCRPC treated with abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included patients with mCRPC in the US Department of Veterans Affairs health care system who initiated treatment with abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide between January 1, 2014, and October 30, 2022. Exposures: Abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide. Main Outcomes and Measures: The study used inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance baseline characteristics between patients initiating abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide and evaluated restricted mean survival time (RMST) differences in overall survival (OS), prostate cancer-specific survival (PCS), time to next treatment switching or death (TTS), and time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (TTR) at different time points after treatment initiation. Results: The study included 5779 patients (median age, 74.42 years [IQR, 68.94-82.14 years]). Median follow-up was between 38 and 60 months. Patients initiating enzalutamide on average had longer OS than those initiating abiraterone acetate, with RMSTs of 24.29 months (95% CI, 23.58-24.99 months) and 23.38 months (95% CI, 22.85-23.92 months), respectively, and a difference in RMST of 0.90 months (95% CI, 0.02-1.79 months) at 4 years. Similarly, TTS and TTR were improved in patients initiating enzalutamide, with an RMST at 4 years of 1.95 months (95% CI, 0.92-2.99 months) longer for TTS and 3.57 months (95% CI, 1.76-5.38 months) shorter for TTR. For PCS, the RMST at 2 years was 0.48 months (95% CI, 0.01-0.95 months) longer. An examination of subgroups identified that enzalutamide initiation was associated with longer RMST in OS among patients without prior docetaxel treatment (1.14 months; 95% CI, 0.19-2.10 months) and in those with PSA doubling time of 3 months or longer (2.23 months; 95% CI, 0.81-3.66 months) but not among patients with prior docetaxel (-0.25 months; 95% CI, -2.59 to 2.09 months) or with PSA doubling time of less than 3 months (0.05 months; 95% CI, -1.05 to 1.15 months). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with mCRPC, initiation of enzalutamide was associated with small but statistically significant improvements in OS, PCS, TTS, and TTR compared with initiation of abiraterone acetate. The improvements were more prominent in short-term outcomes, including TTS and TTR, and in patient subgroups without prior docetaxel or with PSA doubling time longer than 3 months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.